MLS makes the right call, suspending play during 2010 World Cup in South Africa
For Major League Soccer, shutting down for a couple of weeks during the bulk of a World Cup would seem a no-brainer, as instinctive as coming in from the rain. Alas, it hasn't always been so.
So it's big news that MLS has decided to break for two weeks next year during group play at next year's World Cup, a choice that could also be filed under the heading of "about freakin' time."
MLS waved "play on!" during World Cups in 1998, 2002 and 2006, which cracked the league over the noggin to the tune of a triple-whammy effect.
First, it made MLS look like a bunch of non-soccer ninnies who didn't know enough to break for soccer's quadrennial magic land of matches. (The whys and wherefores were more complicated, of course, but it was a miscalculation nonetheless, in my opinion.)
Second, fans were less likely to attend MLS matches when something of superior quality and vastly superior drama was playing out TV. Third, well, if you ever watched a World Cup match and then tuned in immediately to MLS, the disparity in speed of play and skill level was shocking. The same could be said for most domestic leagues, of course. But as most of those leagues aren’t in season at World Cup time, it doesn’t matter. As choice in sports management go, it wasn't as bad as these ... but it wasn't certainly didn't serve the league well.
So this is historic -- and it's the right call for commissioner Don Garber by a big measure. MLS will halt play during group phase of next year's World Cup, which means the first 48 games of the 64-game tournament. There will be no passing and trapping between June 10-25 next summer. Plus, MLS will not play on semifinal dates or on the day of the final.
Soccer fans are surely finding their necks aching from nodding in agreement at this development.
Major League Soccer's reluctance to eliminate matches during World Cup qualifier dates has long been a sore tooth for domestic soccer supporters. MLS took some baby steps in that direction this year, lightening the load during some FIFA World Cup qualifier dates. It was nice little gesture, I suppose. But it was a little like feeding a few grapes to a big ol' hungry man in the mood for a big boy dinner. In other words, it was something … but woefully insufficient in filling the true need.
MLS scheduled just three matches between Aug. 30 and Sept. 12 around a pair of World Cup dates. Of course, most first-tier associations around the world took all matches off the calendar.
And Major League Soccer will play a reduced schedule during the second weekend of October as qualifying culminates around the world. (Interestingly, the league avoided scheduling the Galaxy during the September and October windows, presumably so David Beckham won't have to miss MLS matches.
Why is the decision to halt play during the World Cup so important? There is a perception that MLS isn't "real" professional soccer. Some of that is down to soccer snobbery, the province of folks who believe that if it ain't EPL, it's worthless as pee on a pump handle. Whatever. You can love your EPL or La Liga or Mexican league and keep a little thing for your local MLS club on the side. It's like Big Love that way. You can take a second or third wife, so to speak, and you don't need a pill to keep up.
But MLS has isolated itself on some matters, sometimes as necessity, but other times as a product of poor leadership. How else did we end up those early year beat downs of shootouts and official time kept on the stadium clock and such?
MLS commissioner Don Garber recognized the issue as he came on board 10 years ago. He understood that MLS simply had to connect at a deeper level with soccer fans. It's been a tough slog at some points, and choices to play through FIFA dates didn't help heal the fissures.
Of course, there is a downside to all this: it means further fixture congestion (which is a real problem in MLS, especially in July and August.) And it means more midweek matches. That's not a great thing, as attendance tends to suffer when matches are moved away from weekend dates.
There was other scheduling news Wednesday. Teams will play 30 matches over the 2010 MLS regular season, so no change there. Eight teams will make the playoffs -- status quo there, too. But there is a shift in the scheduling matrix. As
What they’ll do in 2011 as
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Single Table
Since in 2010 all the MLS teams will play each other twice, this effectively becomes a true single table league. Nice>
Congratulations!
I was wondering how long it would take for someone to recognize that. Clearly, not long, as this was the first comment. The single table idea is a scab always ripe for picking by soccer purists.
One whole year
Single table won’t last long though.
How can it? Already the league runs from Mar to Nov. How can one do a single table with 18,19,24 teams have playoffs, international competitions, the US Open Cup and taking time off for National teams?
The answer is it can’t.
The unbalanced schedule is part of life in a America, just not for 2010.
The EPL does it, and they have more teams than the MLS. I think that a single table is a great idea, and when the MLS can learn to coexist with the other events that occur, not just every 4 years but annually as well, then we will have the ability to watch some of the best soccer that our North American players have to offer. In Europe, domestic teams seem to find a way to be competitive, both in country and in their UEFA competitions.
I feel as though the MLS and USA Soccer have been trying to mimic exactly how the soccer is played in England.
CONCACAF Champions League=UEFA Champions League
US Open Cup=FA Cup
It is not a bad strategy to follow suit in how the EPL’s schedule making is done, as it has put them at the top of the world’s football pyramid
by The Eh Team on Sep 16, 2009 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions
The EPL doesn't do it
One, they don’t have 24 teams, but only 20
Two they play in every month but June/July for league play. MLS without the playoff doesn’t play in FOUR months.
And there’s a reason. Chicago in Feb? Toronto in December? Denver in March?
Top European leagues aren’t the parallel. Their fans show up on non-weekends for league play. In the USA that isn’t true outside of Seattle.
Also, the EPL’s longest travel is the shorter than Seattle’s SHORTEST in 2010. A full day can be taken for travel in the USA just for league play.
The MLS doesn’t have 24 either, though I know thats the goal.
And I know weather and travel provide for major obstacles to scheduling, but how does playing home-and-home’s add any more difficulty to that dilemma? With the 18 teams to play in 2011 that would mean only 2 more games than are currently being played now. I feel that until expansion grows beyond the magic number of 20, a single table can provide for a very exciting regular season and easier scheduling for the continental competitions.
And also, the DC United sellout all of their games, weekday or weekend. But I have much love for the Sounders, and what they will help do for the MLS.
by The Eh Team on Sep 17, 2009 12:02 AM EDT up reply actions
one difference between mls and epl
is in the quality of the depth on the rosters. premiere league teams can give their top players rest with less of a dropoff to backup players.
capital letters suck.
DC United doesn't sell out
They average less than 15,000 on all nights. Considering that they didn’t quite fill the stadium when they had the 3rd best attendence in US Open Cup history at just over 17k I’m betting they don’t sell out. United are the class of the first dozen years of MLS, but when even they have difficutly it shows you the problems with weeknight games.
Gameday revenue is the money maker right now in MLS. Having less people at games hurts revenue.
Also 2011 as a single table would be four more games. Where do you find four more weeks to play matches? At least 2011 won’t have as many FIFA international dates.
Yay!
I’m so happy MLS made the right call this time around about the WC. And the single table is great to. And then in 2011 let’s just play 34 games. But it is going to get harder with the CONCACAF and the US Open Cup. But they do it in Britian with the EPL FA Cup Carling Cup Europa UEFA and everything else. So we can do it too. GO MLS!
by hoopsforlife on Sep 16, 2009 10:15 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Doesn’t the MLS CBA expire in February? I mean, this is a good decision, but what if negotiations fail?
"Why the [frak] would I live to 100? I'm 73 and [stuff's] starting to get boring. By the way, there's no money left when I go, just FYI."
We hold our breath.
All this talk about how the league needs to raise the cap, go to single table, etc. will all definitely hinge about how these labor talks go. Unfortunately, a lockout/strike could be a serious blow as all the players can just go abroad to play.
Devils in my heart! Devils in my mind! Devils in my eyes! Devils until I die!
In Lou We Trust - The Devils SBN Blog
by John Fischer on Sep 17, 2009 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions

by 








