Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Infuriating Jose Molina

A way to make the MLS playoffs mean even more

Where I live, everyone has World Series fever. This is an elevated form of the Pennant Fever afflicting the region recently. And that was an exaggerated form of Playoff Baseball Fever that swept through here a month ago.

The excitement has built up, literally, over weeks. (Actually, it’s all quieting down right now, as Texas Rangers fans sneaked out in pre-dawn hours to quietly pull down those flags and scrub the shoe-polished windows in the wake of a 3-1 World Series deficit … but that’s another matter.)

Here’s the point: in professional baseball, basketball and hockey, the playoff excitement has an opportunity to build.  It starts on simmer builds into a roiling boil. The playoffs stay topical over days and weeks as everyone chews on the daily news.

It’s a phenomenon that doesn’t really happen in Major League Soccer – and that’s too bad.

MLS commissioner Don Garber said over the weekend that playoff format change is on the way. One thing I truly hope they change is the clunky shift in formats between the first and second rounds. As it is, the first round is a two-game aggregate series; the “conference” finals are decided in one game.

Forget for a second that it’s just goofy to change in mid-flight. That’s another issue.

The other problem is that the abbreviated format for the conference finals stifles some of the opportunity to generate momentum and further awareness. I know we’re only talking about adding another week, but it’s another little edge for four clubs that could keep the MLS growth curve moving in the right direction.

Star-divide

Look at the way these series go in NBA or NHL. You get a game and then a day or two for everyone to chew on it. If your team loses, you get a day or two of angry rehash and recrimination on talk radio, in local news and all along the interwebs. “The sky is falling!” Maybe it’s not what you’d like to be saying about your team, but everyone is talking about the team and the sport.

If your team wins … well! Coffee shop talk fills up over “our boys” claiming the day! “I think we can take it all!” Then they play again and you repeat the cycle.

Either way, in the big picture it all adds to collective awareness. Everyone who sells tickets for a living will tell you these playoff runs are pure gold in generating sales for the next season. News organizations suddenly know how to find your practice facility, which helps for the next year. People who couldn’t name a player on the roster suddenly know three or four of the big names.

You add fans. The fans that you already have love the whole thing that much more, stacking up the fond memories. That’s what happens in other sports.

But in MLS, these runs are all too brief.  Look at two examples – and both are good ones.

Colorado and Dallas have reasonable chances to win their playoff series. Both teams take a one-goal lead into the road leg of their first-round series. And I think we can all agree that either of these markets need whatever help they can get to help built attendance and local market awareness.

Let’s assume for argument’s sake that they win. They problem is this: they have probably played their last home game. That’s it for Colorado, for sure, as the Rapids can’t possibly host another playoff contest. Dallas would host only if Seattle gets it together and upset Los Angeles.

So, while there would be some opportunity to build a little bit of excitement before a one-game conference final on the road, it’s not the same as a two-game, home-and-away set that includes a home game.

I understand the reasons for a one-game conference final. First, league leaders are loathe to extend the season even one more week. I get that – but the solution is simply adding one week night game into the regular season and starting the playoffs a week earlier.

And I realize that the opportunity to host a final is a way to reward regular season performance. I certainly can appreciate that. But by next year the league will have 18 teams, so it’s getting quickly to the point where just making the playoffs is ample reward for regular season performance.

I think a lot of the momentum to change the playoffs is about the cockamamie pairing methodology, this business of a potential Colorado-San Jose meeting in the “Eastern Conference final.”  Garber said over the weekend that concocting this convoluted structure clearly wasn’t one of the league’s best moments.

I hope they do more. Here’s to one more week to build a little playoff momentum.

If you’re going to have playoffs – and MLS will have playoffs, despite this single table structure idea that just won’t die – then MLS should take full advantage and let the excitement truly build.

Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

An addition to your proposal.

Love home and away for both of the first two rounds. To get the regular-season-won’t-mean-much folks to shut it, how about regular season record as the tiebreak?
Think about it:
 - No more shootouts, which have always felt too random for determining the season outcome for a club. Kicking a stationary ball from 6 feet with only the goalie to beat has little to do with team soccer. It should be the product of only egregious fouls in the box.
 - At least one team in every match will play to win. The bottom team would have to attack, and that makes for more entertaining games. Now it’s too easy for two teams to meet that would take an extremely conservative approach and end up with extremely boring stretches, if not full games.

by fennsk1 on Nov 1, 2010 12:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes...

… I like this.

There is nothing worse that two teams that seem to be standing around during regular time and beyond because they both are somehow convinced that they have an edge in PKs.

And that reminds me of two things…
a) Soccer needs to bring back the sudden-death goal in overtime. (Yes, I intentionally did not write “golden goal”.)
b) Heard this idea years ago: In the regular season, give a team 3 points for a win, zero for a loss, and (if goals have been scored) 1 point for a draw. In other words, the only way a team could earn any points was if they scored at least one goal in a game. Drawing 0-0 would be equivalent to a loss. I like this too.

by wrettubj on Nov 1, 2010 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t quite agree with you there. You say there is nothing worse than teams playing for penalties, convinced they have the edge (although Real Salt Lake, who have benefited most from shootouts in the recent past, always went for the win in extra time), which is true. But bringing back golden goals would only make it worse, with many teams worried more about conceding then actually going for the win. That’s why FIFA got rid of it in the first place.

by Spoonsky on Nov 2, 2010 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

So simple and logical it could never work...

You’re right though, Steve. The additional build-up and home games could go a long way toward generating some additional buzz. The crowd at PHP this past weekend was a lively one and I can only imagine it getting better if we were to have another home game (although I’d rather play LAG to be honest). Let’s hope the MLS FO gets it together quickly on simple crap like this…if for no other reason than the current setup seems random and doesn’t make much sense.

by jyj on Nov 1, 2010 12:29 PM EDT reply actions  

I am all with you here Steve. But one thing I would not like to see is the adoption of the absurd away goals as a tiebreaker rule. Goals are goals are goals.

"We don't care who finishes second." -- Celtic's Peter Lowrie

by Martek on Nov 1, 2010 1:26 PM EDT reply actions  

interested

to hear what you would propose instead?

by I need more Esteban on Nov 1, 2010 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

other leagues do change formats

mid playoff, but they add games rather than take them away. I like the idea of adding the extra game to the conference finals as well. The only ones who don’t benefit may be the players on teams that already have to deal with the ridiculous schedule congestion of MLS, but for a shot at the cup perhaps they wont mind.

breaking a tie is always dodgy in soccer. it’d be nice if they could replay the ties as they do in the FA cup, but that’s clearly not possible (especially with the two-legged format.)

I would propose that a draw over two legs could be decided by a third game at the higher-seeded team’s venue, but what happens when that game ends up tied? the standard extra-time plus PKs seems to be the only viable answer. As much as that is a real anticlimax after 120 mins of soccer, there doesnt seem to be a better solution that’s acceptable.

by ianua ditis on Nov 1, 2010 2:25 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't think that having a third leg would work...

the MLS Cup date is fixed in advance. You could schedule an extra week between the 2nd leg and the start of the next round, but that wouldn’t be very good. You’d potentially wind up with a completely empty week, which wasn’t make sense for a league that struggles with a narrow season window as it is.

I believe in the Mexican league in the event of a draw, the higher-seeded team advances. Not sure if that takes the place of extra time or just penalties.

I sort of like Steve’s idea for the two-legged conference finals, but it does reduce the advantage of having a higher seed quite a bit.

by Howard the Drake on Nov 1, 2010 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Single Table

And I agree, 2 legged w/ away goals the tiebreaker.

by Shawn Gillogly on Nov 1, 2010 8:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Once we get to around twenty teams

we need to take a long, hard look at a relegation/promotion system to keep the entire league compelling and to combat the equivalent of the Pittsburgh Pirates, Los Angeles Clippers, or Cleveland Browns from happening.

"Voetbal is pas totaal als je wint"- Coach Adun
"The greatest sin is to spurn the gift"- Coach Alistair

by Londonjoe on Nov 2, 2010 11:33 AM EDT reply actions  

re changing the playoffs

Uh, the Rapids COULD have one more playoff game in the Conference Final, IF San Jose beats the Red Bulls (and the Rapids beat the Crew). So you might want to edit that part of your article anyway.

by Scott Olesen on Nov 2, 2010 2:21 PM EDT reply actions  

at this point

all they would have to do is get a draw at Columbus, and they’d be at home next. Oops!

'Gentlemen' he said,
'I don't need your organization,
I've shined your shoes,
moved your mountains and marked your cards,
but Eden is burning.
Either get ready for elimination,
or else your heart must have the courage,
for the changing of the guards.'

by Sgc on Nov 6, 2010 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

The playoff system sucks

And really makes no sense. Any change would be an improvement.

by Cool Dudes on Nov 6, 2010 11:41 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's soccer blog is heavy on the domestic game -- flavored with a dash the global greatness

Recent Posts


Managers

Daily_soccer_fix_crest_small Steve Davis