Tonight's MLS Cup kickoff; Why so late?
TORONTO – It’s cold in Toronto. And it will be colder at 8:55 p.m. ET when the teams finally kickoff today.
I wasn’t completely opposed to Toronto’s selection as MLS Cup final site. It was certainly a bold choice. But as the city supports MLS, embraces soccer in general and regularly fills its swell grounds at Exhibition Place, I say it was worth the risk of some poor weather. So, three cheers for you Canucks, eh?
But when you set the kickoff time for 9 p.m., that adjusts the calculus of it all. It’s not quite as solid of a choice in my mind when you factor in that time.
So, why is MLS starting its most important annual match so late? Read on ...
This is where it’s tricky. Major League Soccer officials will tell you quietly that going up against a Sunday night NFL game isn’t ideal, but it’s palatable, at least. Going up against a full slate of NFL contest … that's a big ol' no-no! That’s a recipe for awful ratings.
So, what about a Saturday final? That’s a non-starter; broadcast partner ESPN won’t even consider squeezing out one of its cash-cow college football broadcasts for the MLS Cup.
The other thing to consider is that an 8:55 p.m. start is pretty late for those East coast TV sets, whose viewers may be getting a little sleepy by the second half. On the other hand, it’s a 7:55 kickoff in Dallas, a 6:55 kickoff in Colorado and a nice, comfy 5:55 early-supper kickoff for viewers along the West Coast.
Sure, they could get whatever slot they wanted, any time of their choice, on one of the smaller networks. Fox Soccer Channel, for instance, would play ball. So would Versus, if the league opts to go that way next year rather than / in addition to FSC. But both of those networks have a much smaller national footprint, so that's probably not the way to go either.
This is a case were their are two types of solutions. Imperfect, and even less imperfect.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wasn't there a day
When the MLS Cup actually was shown on real national TV, ABC covered it for a couple years didn’t they? I wonder if FSC and Fox would have made a concession to put it on either earlier on Sunday or Saturday on their broadcast network or FX? I would be happy with either of those. I would have been happier with an earlier start time on ESPN, ESPN2 seems like a normal choice since that is where they normally stick MLS on their networks. I have not and continue to not be impressed with MLS’s handling of their TV rights, but in this case I almost understand the problems in getting this match any attention on TV. So now they won’t fight the NFL coverage, now they match is up against the AMA’s. There is little winning for MLS with ABC/ESPN.
The ABC MLS Cups were bad for...
… west coast viewers. I remember having to eat breakfast while watching the game so they could squeeze it into ABC’s lineup. It sucked as it killed any chance of having an MLS Cup viewing party.
9pm ko??
That’s just stupid; it’s the middle of November…
The half-empty stands in extra time attest to this as well
Don't let the bastards get you down. Even the burnt orange ones.
by Hopkins Horn on Nov 22, 2010 12:40 AM EST up reply actions
Just another reason...
… to let the highest seeded team host the cup. Those stands would have been full if not for the neutral field.
How about a midweek match?
Play it on Tuesday when there isn’t any competition with football and ESPN isn’t contractually tied to any other sports since they do NBA on Wednesdays and Fridays.
Two roads diverged in a wood and I – I tweeted my followers to ask which I should take
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Nov 23, 2010 9:35 PM EST reply actions

by 






