Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Two Minutes Of Thunder Basketball Wins The Game

More than one way to skin a FIFA cat; or to bribe him

There are plenty of things in this old world I know absolutely nothing about.  Zilch.  Like women’s shoes. Or fly fishing. Or macramé.

And bribes. I know diddly-squat about the high-dollar, high-stakes, hifalutin world of bribery.

Why would I? I’m a journalist. Far as I can tell the very first requirements of a good, proper bribe are bags full of cash.  As a journalist, I measure my cash and my paychecks in little cups, not big barrels.

But I did me some thinking on this subject over the weekend as it relates to the recent awarding of World Cup 2018 and 2022.

I think everyone assumes that financial flimflam may be exchanged at the highest levels, that money would change hands “A to B” in a rather straight forward, linear fashion right from the top.  And it may.  I honestly don’t know. This is all hypothetical and theoretical, of course – I have no more evidence than anyone else of anything improper actually taking place in and around last week’s Zurich zaniness.

But maybe there was something else at work … maybe any malfeasance goes on a couple of rungs lower on the ladder? 

Star-divide

 

Let’s say me and a bunch of buddies are in construction. Big-job stuff, like hotels, high rises and shopping centers. And stadiums. And train stations.

Now let’s say we do a lot of business with the well-heeled Middle Eastern lands, like the UAE, Saudi Arabia. And Qatar.

So my buddies and I begin to look at plans that would involve oodles of construction contracts. Like the erection of lots of stadiums. And train stations. If these could be worth millions and millions to me and my buddies, wouldn’t it behoove us to get in the game, so to speak?  To cozy up to the deciders … and maybe to pony up, too?

Or how about this: what if me and my buds owned a security company, one with close ties to the people who award contracts to these things. Wouldn’t a World Cup provide a whole kit and caboodle of business?

What about the owners of those hotels in Qatar? Don’t they have a big stake in the game?

Obviously, all this applies to Russia, too. Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin says the original budget outline of $640 million dollars won’t come close to covering all the related prep costs. His estimates put the cost of construction of the stadiums and the infrastructure at around $10 billion U.S.

That’s a lot of incentive, isn’t it? So you look at who is getting the projects?  Who gets the contracts to install the rails they are talking about to link the far-flung venues? Who gets the contracts to manage them?  Who owns and invests in those companies?

All of this goes back to one central point, one missing element in all this: transparency of FIFA’s processes.  At least everyone would have a fighting chance of following the money.

Again, I don’t know much about this stuff. What I wrote above is most likely just a starting point, a “child’s view” of high-dollar graft. You MBAs and business people with more book-schoolin’ on ways of the financial world probably can take this a little further …

Comment 17 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

$10 US?

That’s a heck of an exchange rate. Or maybe not, the dollar has been dropping like a rock…

by vineyarddawg on Dec 6, 2010 12:25 PM EST reply actions  

No, Putin's just a poor estimator.

@jschnauzer
Bloggin' at http://joepasdoghouse.com

by Cairo on Dec 6, 2010 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I think that the bottom line...

… is that FIFA’s selection process and the ExCom is as dirty as the bottom of a barrel of oil. Major reform and replacement of the top officials is the only thing that can adequately address the problem, IMO. That won’t happen without some major action like a boycott or all of Europe’s big federations pulling out of FIFA or something like that.

by vineyarddawg on Dec 6, 2010 12:28 PM EST reply actions  

Follow the Money!

Always rule #1!

Win or lose, we will always be here for you.

by johnjahafanclub on Dec 6, 2010 4:10 PM EST reply actions  

The world badly needs a Deep Throat

to come forward from within FIFA and meet with Grant Wahl and Steve Davis, the modern day Woodward/Bernstein, in a dark parking garage somewhere in Zurich, and whisper to them, “follow the money…”

Win or lose, we will always be here for you.

by johnjahafanclub on Dec 6, 2010 4:12 PM EST reply actions  

Thanks for that

hopefully the source will name names

Win or lose, we will always be here for you.

by johnjahafanclub on Dec 6, 2010 7:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Think Individual Payoff

Steve, while your scenario makes sense, I think it’s more venal and individually driven then that.

1. Look at our CONCACAF head Warner—the man is accused of scalping tickets. No way that helps T&T or CONCACAF. It’s just an individual pocketing some cash.

2. Chuck Blazer—US rep—didn’t vote for England in round one. If he voted for Russia (certainly plausible and makes the most sense—why would he vote for Portugal-Spain or Netherlands-Belgium over England?).

I wouldn’t put it past anyone to trade votes to help a construction firm or security firm or just to help their association (“you vote for me in 2018 and I vote for you in 2022”). But it seems to me more like a group of “Top Hats” who just sold their votes for personal benefit…even if in some cases it may have even hurt their association (for instance, the failure of the US to get all of the Concacaf votes in round one). And it doesn’t even have to be as obvious as a bag of cash. It can be a site visit with a luxury suite in the best hotel, a bunch of hookers, catered dinners from executive chefs and then a visit or two from a representative of that country who offers to pay for lunch a couple of times to talk about “FIFA business”.

by JoeWillmore on Dec 6, 2010 5:24 PM EST reply actions  

wow

how does he still have a job?

by mjs2103 on Dec 7, 2010 2:53 PM EST up reply actions  

he's denying it and says he voted for the US and Russia

…but who the hell knows.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Dec 7, 2010 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

No no no

Let’s take him at his word.

He only sold his vote to Russia.

by Cool Dudes on Dec 8, 2010 12:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Are you Seriuos?

How could that be

What could they have bribed him with when he’s got all this?

I

Dude Couldn’t be bought out cheap . . .

No no no what am I thinking, his loyalty is clearly for the Americas


I’m GOING TO QATAR BITCHES!!!

by Cool Dudes on Dec 8, 2010 12:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Not where I thought you were going

What I thought you were going to say is that the possible reason that both bids went to the bidder that needed the most infrastructure work is that the corrupt ExCom members hoped to get kickbacks on the contracts.

'Gentlemen' he said,
'I don't need your organization,
I've shined your shoes,
moved your mountains and marked your cards,
but Eden is burning.
Either get ready for elimination,
or else your heart must have the courage,
for the changing of the guards.'

by Sgc on Dec 6, 2010 6:59 PM EST reply actions  

The obvious bribery

Qatar will have dismantle-able stadiums that they plan on sending to needy countries.
Who here doesn’t think Trinidad and Tobago will get one?

by fennsk1 on Dec 7, 2010 8:16 AM EST reply actions  

How did a man that disgustingly obese come to represent the US in a game that requires such fitness?

If it's too loud, turn it down.

by renstar on Dec 7, 2010 10:45 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's soccer blog is heavy on the domestic game -- flavored with a dash the global greatness

Recent Posts


Managers

Daily_soccer_fix_crest_small Steve Davis