Sniff, sniff ... Is that real trouble we smell at D.C. United?
Two quick follow-ups on this morning’s dispatch on diversity, a concept that doesn’t suck at all.
First, see how you can get in trouble when you don’t practice safe diversity, kids? What was Vanity Fair thinking?
And then there is occasional need to “diversify,” which is “diversity’s” naughty little cousin.
Why do I get the feeling that D.C. United owner Will Chang and his new longing to “diversify” ownership in the nation’s capital spells real trouble?
Washington Post ace news hound Steven Goff has the skinny. But reading between the lines here, I’d say it’s a fairly safe assumption that what Chang really wants to “diversify” is the red ink. Ya know, spread the love a little and let someone else take part of the losses.
Sounds like a hulluva deal, eh? Ick. That’s the kind of love that doesn’t need to be spread.
D.C. United’s perennial chase for a stadium (we call it a “forever home” in our dog rescue circles) is a freakin’ mess. Has been for a long time. Meanwhile, D.C. United continues to languish as Exhibit A on how a relatively successful franchise in so many ways will lose money like there’s no tomorrow without the benefit of all the dedicated revenue streams a stadium creates.
There are a lot of good details in Goff’s piece. But I’ll break it down for you right here: I fear more and more for the future of the club in D.C.
0 recs |
6 comments
Comments
This has a been a nightmare from the beginning
How does Kansas City have a stadium done and we don’t? How is it that a smaller city, with less fans, and worse team (historically) has found value in building a stadium than DC? I just don’t understand the problem. The fans here are guaranteed to show up! These fans showed up in away games in Mexico. You know they’ll show up to a DC United stadium.
by monk81 on Feb 3, 2010 9:58 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I know it's frustrating for United fans
I feel bad for you guys. It does underscore the complexities and all the moving parts involved in these things.
by Steve Davis on Feb 3, 2010 1:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I take a more positive interpretation
DC United’s losses can’t be something Will Chang didn’t know about when he bought out Victor MacFarlane only months ago. If the losses concerned him, he would have hired someone to look for partners right away.
The better interpretation, it seems to me, comes from DC United’s three mistakes in pursuing a stadium:
1 They wanted too big a project (stadium + neighborhood development around it)
2 They put all their eggs in one basket, location-wise (they even did it a second time when the first option fell through)
3 They didn’t cement an alliance with anyone that had local pull (even going back to Anschutz, who was an out of town businessman, who worked mostly with the Feds on getting the Poplar Point land transfered because he had deep connections with the Republican then-majority, and assumed the District stuff would get itself worked out if he got them essentially free land).
This represents Chang’s attempt to correct the third mistake.
As to the other two, Chang has said his requirements are simpler (a 12-13 acre plot to stick a stadium on), and DC has dallied with every location willing to take Kevin Payne’s phone calls, even as far away as Baltimore (knowing in all likelihood that a move to Baltimore means it becomes a different team, almost as much as if it moved to St. Louis).
'Gentlemen' he said,
'I don't need your organization,
I've shined your shoes,
moved your mountains and marked your cards,
but Eden is burning.
Either get ready for elimination,
or else your heart must have the courage,
for the changing of the guards.'
by Sgc on Feb 3, 2010 1:39 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Two sides to every story
There is no avoiding the idea that this could be a sign of real danger. However, there are also reasons to look at this as simply a reasonable move by a man who wants DC United to remain DC United. For example, as Chang himself says, he bought out MacFarlane and Blue Devil Holdings; if he had wanted group ownership for the sole purpose of sharing the losses, that wouldn’t have happened. MacFarlane wanted out the moment Poplar Point died, so his share probably needed to be split up, but Blue Devil Holdings would have been retained if Chang was simply looking for someone else to take some of the hits.
I agree with Sgc on the point that Chang needs to find local investors that have sway with the local governments. That means a real connection, not just support from Marion Barry after he looked at the plans. Despite the congestion, there are still multiple areas large enough to fit a 20K seater with parking that are near Metro and/or within the Beltway.
The other thing this bid to build needs is pretty simple: More money. We can’t ask any local jurisdiction for public funds for building. Hell, we couldn’t even ask DC to do the roadwork and sewer systems at Poplar Point – which will have to be done no matter what is eventually built there – without the Post’s Metro desk turning it into “United wants a massive public handout for their stadium” and then never correcting it (and the Post is one of the most soccer-friendly papers in the country). We can probably get a plot of land for free, and after that it seems like we’ll be very lucky to get anything else. Until the economy is recovering in all facets, and local and state budgets aren’t all requiring massive cuts, this project is strictly DIY.
by ChestRockwell on Feb 3, 2010 2:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I sure hope not...
And this from an FCD fan. We need that franchise to succeed.
Chad the Ref
by Chad the Ref on Feb 3, 2010 4:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Sgc & ChestRockwell
Thx. Having lived in DC I was aware of the congestion problems, but the other insights give me some hope Chang is in this for the long haul. I always felt too that United were trying very hard to stay in DC proper, rather than move out in the suburbs, and this makes the job harder. I think it was Steve who made the point that Pizza Hut Park is nice, but out of the way, and I think DC is trying really hard to avoid that error.
by DrWeevil on Feb 5, 2010 10:49 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 









