Sacha Kljestan just called; he wants his mojo back
Also file under: What a wild-ass difference a year makes
Just one year ago, Sacha Kljestan was on top of the world, kickin' butt and takin' names on a breathtaking climb up the U.S. Soccer personnel ranks. He was coming off trial at Celtic, the Scottish giant and the mop-topped midfielder's would-be address. There, Kljestan could fulfill his destiny as the next great
At the end of January Kljestan was all that and a bag of chips, recording all three
Major League Soccer had a reported offer dangling in the neighborhood of $3 million. (Don’t you think MLS would like a do-over on this one?) Meanwhile, U.S. manager Bob Bradley was looking at a slashing, swashbuckling attacker who was about to spend 18 months prior to South Africa 2010 steeling himself in a rugged league, where winning isn’t just requested, it’s absolutely essential. What a sweet set-up. The rest of us were lifting our pencils along a similar train of thought, about to write in Kljestan to the starting World Cup lineup.
By the way, Celtic wasn’t believed to be the only option. The Daily Mail in England reported that Holland’s FC Twente and Heerenveen, the French league’s Monaco and Germany’s Wolfsburg were all lurking nearby, considering a run at Kljestan if things went South at Celtic Park.
That was all just more than 12 months ago. So what happened?
MLS and Celtic couldn’t agree on a deal (in negotiations that were almost surely complicated by the notorious sell-on clauses, which frequently muck up these matters). From there, for whatever reason, Kljestan shrank noticeably in MLS matches. Where he was large and in charge before, the Chivas USA man was suddenly “just another guy” around MLS parks. The bummer factor of a huge career move that almost was surely played a part.
So it went in national team matches, with Kljestan making little noise in matches for Bradley.
Kljestan did rise a bit toward the end of the MLS campaign, but the confidence and instincts that had soared previously now seemed badly dented, still in need of major repair.
So here we are, about one year later, and this is where Kljestan finds himself:
In need of a dominant performance in a relatively obscure February friendly just to get himself back into real consideration for the 23-man roster that will go to
Robbie Rogers, Jose Francisco Torres and Stuart Holden have lapped Kljestan in the pecking order of reserve outside midfielders. Possibly Brad Davis, too.
The
Injuries and significant reduction in form by players like Kljestan are the reason.
The Chivas USA midfielder still has a chance – but it’s a slim one.
1 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
Injury?
That’s always my first thought when something like this happens. Maybe he’s got an hidden hitch in his giddy-up. It’s mystifying, in any case.
Not mediocre. Right about average
Good Call
a very likely possibility
You can change your job, you can change your wife, you can even change your gender, but you can never change your club.
Win or lose, we will always be here for you.
Fear no foe, wherever we go.
by johnjahafanclub on Feb 23, 2010 2:02 PM EST up reply actions
I don't about that
Injury … over a few weeks, OK, I’d buy it. But we’re talking about the better part of a year. He didn’t look particularly impressive in the U.S. January friendly. Not that anyone else did, either. Still, you’d think that he came into that game KNOWING that he HAD to make an impression. I didn’t see anything special. So it remains a mystery to me.
Could be
I was just thinking that maybe he’s trying to play through something that he knows will require surgery and put him out for 6-12 months. Perhaps he was hoping to make it work and address the issue after the World Cup. I did something similar a few years back, and it was a mistake on my part. I eventually just had to go under the knife and start the slog through rehab.
Bear in mind this is rank speculation on my part.
Not mediocre. Right about average
well, again, it could be. but ...
… i talked to Sacha about last year when I was in Cali a month ago. he didn’t mention it. sometimes athletes hide these things. but usually, at some point, they’ll say something along the lines of, “well, i was carrying a bit of an injury.” we may never know, but I just doubt that’s the case here.
I'm Just Used to Assuming It's an Injury
As I am also an Oakland A’s fan, who have used the DL a record number of times two years in a row now, and have a long history of players hiding injuries, performing terribly, and then making their injuries and subsequent rehab stints far worse.
You can change your job, you can change your wife, you can even change your gender, but you can never change your club.
Win or lose, we will always be here for you.
Fear no foe, wherever we go.
by johnjahafanclub on Feb 23, 2010 8:36 PM EST up reply actions
best headline ever
So I have to admit that your headline caught my attention, made me think and made me laugh. After reading the whole of the post it almost makes me cry. You have to wonder what could have been.
irony!
whoa whoa whoa, guys. slow it down just a little bit.
steve, didn’t you post just yesterday about how donovan once deserved much of the criticism he got…but has since worked hard to silence the doubters? he was a wunderkind who failed to live up to expectations, but who eventually filled his own shoes.
so why is everyone ready to close the book on kljestan already, talking about “what could have been”? relax. he’s a few years younger than donovan; he has plenty of time to get his swagger back. sure, we’d like to see that happen before the world cup, but if it doesn’t, that doesn’t mean kljestan is done for.
after doing so well a year ago, the pressure got poured on him. in those situations where he knew he HAD to do SOMETHING, like steve was talking about, maybe he tried too hard to force his chances. it’s easy to see how someone could fade in the face of all that attention. he’ll get it back.
by michaeljspinelli on Feb 23, 2010 5:08 PM EST reply actions
Bummer
Nice little article, as Klejstan was someone that stuck out to me a lot last year. He was on top of it all, didn’t get his move to Europe, and then everything just sort of fell apart.
Not that I’m an expert, but I would guess morale is the largest issue here. The contracts didn’t work out like he wanted, and a little rain on his parade ruined his year. Hopefully he can come back this year refreshed and ready to fight his way back up. There was a lot of pressure on him I think, especially considering he is still young. But, we know he has the abilities, he just needs to get his head in sync and play like the player we know he is.
One last thought, in a way I sort of feel the US play in a similar manner. What I mean is, I feel the US is a good team and deservedly could be a top 10 regular contender. However, I’ve often thought they aren’t always out there giving 100%. Not that they aren’t playing hard, but more that they play differently sometimes, like they are holding back or afraid to come out and play their game…
holding back?
i’ve never thought it makes any sense to say that a team is holding back, or “afraid to play their game.” how and why would that ever be logical or possible? why would a team hold back? don’t they want to win? there are plenty of reasons why a team wouldn’t win a given game, but i don’t think the reason is EVER “they were holding back.” it just doesn’t make sense. i think it’s far more likely that the players FAIL to play their game, than that they somehow refuse to. players screw up. that’s the simpler, and much more logical answer. if you go up to a player after the game and ask him why his team lost, he wouldn’t say “we didn’t WANT to play our game.” more likely he’d say, “we didn’t succeed at playing our game.”
by michaeljspinelli on Feb 24, 2010 11:11 AM EST up reply actions
Re: Holding Back
I am talking about more when a team comes out against a team that they feel is better than them, they just play differently sometimes, like they owe something to the other team. The Confederations Cup was the perfect example of this, as they did not show much in the first few games. Then, when all hope was lost, the US all of a sudden started to really play their game. Once they got the momentum going, the rest of the tournament they played their game and it turned into a high point for US soccer in the last 5 or so years at least.
It will be nice when the US can always come out against any opponent, and not feel like the opponent is better, but that they can hang with the best of them…
Here's the difference...
Donovan at least went to Europe (3x) and is now succeeding there. Landon has always torn up MLS. Sasha has never gone to Europe, and fades in and out at Chivas USA. And with his form now, may never go. That’s why Sasha’s window is closing faster.
Chad the Ref
So what about Sacha?
I don’t think Sacha was all that to begin with. He hit a hat trick against a lackluster Sweden team and let it all go to his head. He just thought he’d arrived. But he has never dominated in MLS like he should have. He doesn’t even come close.
I agree with you
I’ve never understood why Bob Bradley liked him so much. I’ve also never seen him play like he was all that other than one game.
by the12thman11 on Feb 24, 2010 1:54 PM EST up reply actions
Sacha....
I’ve been a Chivas USA fan since 2006. I’ve seen Sacha progress, regress, progress, and then regress again. Not sure what to expect this year.
He’s always been a bit over-hyped.
He’s never really shown the qualities of being a leader or captain.
He’s very inconsistent and seems to have trouble controlling his emotions.
For the record, he started to decline after he came back from the Olympics. He kept playing despite a MAJOR drop in form.
I really hope he grows up and plays to his potential. (yawn)
"Go get the Gimp!"
Not Specifically Related
But Sacha’s problems show a larger issue with our limited talent pool. A poor run of form or injury to a minor player (let alone Gooch, Dempsey, or Davies) can really hamper our WC chances. Here is hoping that all our guys can get in a good run of form (and healthy) leading up the the WC.

by 















