The Oguchi Onyewu matter: Is he World Cup ready?
Oguchi Onyewu needed to begin allaying concerns last night against the
I don’t know if Onyewu can recover the requisite mobility and timing in the next two weeks. I’m not saying he can’t, I’m just saying we still don’t know. We don’t know where he is in terms of speed, strength, agility, stamina timing and, yes, leaping ability. Ahem.
Neither does anybody else who saw Tuesday’s match, which included several defensive lowlights. People privy to the closed practice sessions know a little more about his course of work over a week and change. The rest of us still don’t have answers.
But I do know this: if Onyewu hasn’t shown more in practice, then he still has a lot to prove based on last night’s mixed bag. He had two basic objectives in this ongoing pre-World Cup camp: to re-gain match fitness and technical sharpness that he’ll need in big supply come June 12 in Rustenburg, and; to show coaches in matches that he can cut it.
It’s on him to prove that he can pass muster in a full-speed, weighty World Cup match, where mistakes are punished with extreme prejudice. Again, he didn’t prove that he couldn’t do it last night … but neither did he prove World Cup-worthy. Surely he understands this? Surely he understands what’s at stake, that he has to prove his place just like anyone else? Or does he?
(Onyewu gets defensive ... after the jump)
Onyewu got defensive last night when reporters asked about rustiness. What, he didn’t anticipate those questions? He hasn’t played in seven months, and he’s days away from dealing with Wayne Rooney and
"Did you see any rustiness?"
Hmmm. Look here, big guy, being churlish with the press is not going to make things any easier on you in the long run. Trust me on this one. You start rolling that bolder downhill and it’s going to gain momentum fast.
And besides that, yes, we did see some. Suffice to say, being beaten easily on headers is not why you got a deal with AC Milan, where they work in defense the way
Leonardo da Vinci worked in ground-breaking art.
Onyewu wanted to dismiss his inability to issue a critical challenge as just one of those things. "He jumped before me. While he was in the air and I’m just trying to jump up, he had his forearm keeping me down. He just put his weight against me and jumped early, that’s all."
That’s all, eh? What about this: you get a little closer to your mark on a set piece from a dangerous place? Is that too much to ask? That’s pretty much a staple of center back’s job, yeah? (FYI: anyone remember who was beaten at the near post on Jan Koller’s header four years ago, the Czech’s first goal – one that got the ball rolling in the wrong direction in
Indications of Onyewu’s mobility at the moment (or lack of it) are exactly what people are looking for. If he could have gotten closer to Tomas Sivok a little faster Tuesday, he would have been in position to leap. Coaches tell players all the time, they don’t have to win a clean header in that situation, but they do have to issue a strong challenge, just to keep the attacker from doing exactly what Sivok did, cleanly deposit his header in a precise location. In order to do so, they have to be tight. It’s all about positioning and relationship to the player and the goal. It’s not a mortal sin to be three steps away from your mark – but it’s not rustiness, then what is it? He didn’t know he should have been closer?
I don’t know if Onyewu was being obtuse here or if he truly believes he wasn’t culpable. I just think I’d feel a little better this morning if the big center back had said something like this in the post-game analysis: "Yeah, I got beat and I have to do better. We’ve got a World Cup coming up, and if I can’t mark a man on a set piece, then we need someone in there who can. I’ll get there. Trust me."
Otherwise, Onyewu’s night was uneventful. He seemed to look a little awkward at times; then again, he’s never been an elegant defender. Maldini he ain’t. That’s not a criticism, it’s just to say that we couldn’t tell much from a night where the Czech strikers weren’t much of a menace. (A strange thing to say after a the home team gives up a four-spot, I realize; most of the real damage came along that U.S. left side, which continues to be a real bugger.)
Let’s hope Onyewu looks a little better on Saturday.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Jumping
I’ve seen Steve Davis jump higher than Gooch did last night.
The easy comparison is between Gooch and his partner in the center, Goodson. Goodson was really good in the air and a bit more mobile (though he did whiff on that one goal).
But the additional problem is that Bradley has to figure out if Gooch is going to be the starter and if not, does he continue to give him minutes to build up his fitness or concentrate on building the chemistry of a different pairing? How much longer does he have to assess his fitness and decide if he is going to be a starter?
How much longer does he have to assess his fitness and decide if he is going to be a starter?
I would like to think he has that figured out before the match against Australia on June 5. After the Turkey game Saturday should be a better indicator than last night’s match.
Columbus til I die, Columbus til I die. I know I am, I swear I am, Columbus til I die!
"Turner, at midcourt...inside it, at the buzzer, GOT IT!!!!"
by Andrew Tolliver on May 26, 2010 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions
Ya know…Chad Marshall is pretty dominant in the air…
Columbus til I die, Columbus til I die. I know I am, I swear I am, Columbus til I die!
"Turner, at midcourt...inside it, at the buzzer, GOT IT!!!!"
by Andrew Tolliver on May 26, 2010 11:12 AM EDT reply actions
Yeah, I like Marshall a lot
.. but he’s struggling with a hamstring issue, too. It’s a tough choice, because the boss DOES need to see Onyewu. And he has to see the guys who might (or might not) partner with him. These aren’t easy decisions.
by Steve Davis on May 26, 2010 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions
If not for giving up the free header I think people would be saying that Onyewu was well on his way back. Of course one mistake is all it takes. I still feel that the team needs him back and in form to have a chance of doing anything in South Africa.
Los Angeles is like Manchester. There is a red team that wins championships and a blue team that doesn't.
I Was really hopeful that Onyewu would be a difference maker v. England
but now I am convinced that Capello will just run at him until he is word down to a nib.
Will run at the left side
and cross into Gooch’s spot.
Which is a real worry. It will be interesting to see, but I’m now not very hopeful about the game against England. Or Slovenia. We always have a bitch of a time against East Euro teams.
"Did you see any rustiness?"
I heard that on the radio this morning, and I thought it was a pretty asinine question for Gooch to ask. Look, if someone had come up to him on October 1 and said, “Hey, Gooch, how about after this qualifier against Costa Rica you just sit out and don’t even get on the pitch until late May? I think that would be a great way for you to prepare for the World Cup!” I guarantee you Gooch would not have replied, “Absolutely! No way would I be even a little rusty!”
Of course he’s rusty. Anyone would be. He doesn’t need to be defensive about that. And it’s not like denying it to a reporter is going to change what Bradley thinks, anyway.
"And Julio Franco is batting right-handed!" -- Wayne Hagin, A's radio play-by-play, mid-80s
Different take
Everyone’s banging Onyewu up for not getting up high while backpedaling with a man on his back. Fair enough; that’s part of the job description for center backs. My issue with Gooch was less about that and more on what caused him to be in that position in the first place.
Looking at video of the goal, you see Onyewu lining up away from his man and away from the larger pack of players that generally forms on free kicks. This would be an odd place for someone to choose to line themselves up; essentially, it was like Gooch was playing zonally while everyone else was picking up a man. I have my doubts about whether Onyewu would play that way given a choice. His positioning struck me as a pre-planned decision to use Gooch to make the area between the far post and the middle of the goal (a common target for freekicks) essentially a no man’s land. My take is that this was an idea to force free kick takers to look up, see Gooch, and play the ball elsewhere (ideally, areas that Guzan would be facing from his starting position). It’s a strategy that leaves takers choosing between trying to avoid Guzan catching/punching the cross, or going for a jump ball with Onyewu.
This plan would probably work, except it leaves the area beyond the far post wide open. Note that Gooch’s first steps are inside, between the far post and the pack of players, before he realizes that the flight of the ball is carrying it beyond the zone he initially was guarding. From that point on, it was going to take a fairly difficult athletic movement to save the day. Jumping high while backpedaling is hard to do, and it’s far from the ideal position to put yourself in. It’s even harder when a large man is already jumping up in a conventional fashion, giving him a massive advantage. Finally, since Gooch was picking up the flight of the ball late in the process, he was also dealing with having less time to judge where to put himself to prevent the header.
This is all a long-winded way of saying that my problem was with his judgment, not with his jumping ability. It’s awfully facile to say “Well, he’s not fit, he can’t jump,” but that requires ignoring all of the context one can read into this play. If Bradley chose this mix of man-to-man coverage with a single zonal marker, this play should disabuse him of using it again. If not, then Gooch has some even bigger questions to ask about what he was doing on that play from start to finish. Either way, this was first of all a failure in planning, before it was ever an issue of physical ability.
tactics
I don’t have a problem with using Onyewu that way if that’s what the defense was doing, but if you are going to have a floater back there then you have to make that every Czech player is man marked as well. If what you’re saying is true, then the system broke down or just wasn’t very well thought out.
Not mediocre. Right about average
I think Gooch was fine
Yeah, he got beat on a header when he was tracking backwards, and it shouldn’t happen. But honestly? I came into that game worried about a lot more than that. I thought we were going to see a guy who stayed planted in his spot, got rid of the ball quickly, and rarely ventured out to challenge. Instead, for someone who hasn’t played since October, he was sharp on the ball, aggressive (if just a split second slow) going out to the sides and moving upfield, and his positioning was solid throughout. I don’t have any problem with folks pointing out that he got beat on a header—that’s fine. But allowing it to taint his full body of work last night is silly.
Hear, hear
It seemed to me that everything else he did last night, he did well. Just missed that one header. Unfortunately, in the World Cup, that’s all it takes.

by 








