Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Transfer Rumor: Bolton On Verge of First Signings

Propensity to fall behind could bite the U.S. World Cup effort

Tim Howard ... must be especially vigilant early

If you know a guy who knows a guy – if you know what I mean – here’s the best bet you could make concerning the first U.S. World Cup match: England to score first.

Clearly, there are no guarantees in life. There are always mysterious forces at work – otherwise, women wouldn’t keep marrying Larry King.

But the data suggests strongly that the United States will concede the first goal. Bob Bradley’s men have done so in all five friendlies this year. They started off the year in a 3-0 hole against Honduras. They also had to fight back against deficits against El Salvador, Netherlands, Czech Republic and Turkey. Only El Salvador and Turkey could be salvaged into victories.

Back in final round CONCACAF qualifying, sleepy starts saw the United States fell behind initially six times through 10 matches. Most concerning were instances where the Americans allowed the opener at home, although they did rally to win over Honduras in Chicago and El Salvador in Utah. Similarly, they rallied for a valuable victory in Costa Rica and a draw in El Salvador.

Bradley frequently found solace in the positive responses – even if the matches were admittedly less comfortable than they needed to be. Here's what he said along the way:

"You do feel that pressure for a moment, but there was a real strong response from the players on the field," the U.S. manager said after rallying to prevail over El Salvador. "That says a lot about what these players are all about.

"It’s not what you’re hoping for," Bradley said with a weary grin. "Soccer is crazy sometimes. You take the initiative in games, but it doesn’t always mean you’re going to score. Ultimately, you hope it’s something you can turn around, but it’s nice to see everybody understand that the game’s not over when we fall behind."

(Not just a Bradley problem; it was Bruce Arena's too ... after the jump.)

Star-divide

There is some hope. As with all U.S. hope this summer, it goes back to the Confederations Cup. Bradley's men did manage to secure the first goal in four of five matches. But as these were essentially glorified friendlies, that should come with an asterisk. 

Of course, none of this is solely a Bradley thing. The whole World Cup effort fell apart four years ago in large part due to early concession of the lead. It took the United States just five minutes to position themselves behind the 8 Ball against the Czech Republic in Gelsekirchen.

They fell behind Italy after 22 minutes before the heroic, nine-man stand in Kaiserslautern. And the 22nd was the vulnerable moment once again as Ghana took the early lead in the U.S. first-round finale.

Bruce Arena admonished reporters again and again for failing in their critical analysis, in his eyes, to see how these early goals changed the calculus of it all.

Of course, that was beside the point – Arena just didn’t see it that way. The rub should have been: "Why are you falling behind? Isn’t that a symptom of the toxin?"

A lot of U.S. soccer fans hope the same questions won’t be asked in South Africa. But an alarming sample of evidence suggests that they will.

Comment 10 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Slovenia won't press the attack

And we should be quicker than their counter. I’m pretty sure we fall behind to England at some point, but they may let us claw back in. Can Algeria challenge us on the ball and exploit some of our weaknesses? They’re a poor mans Egypt (I know they beat them, but the splits aren’t in their favor), and we hammered them. I’m more worried about being able to break down Slovenia tactically than almost anything else in this tournament.

by Londonjoe on Jun 1, 2010 12:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Agree on breaking down Slovenia ...

… but I think that plays right into being vulnerable on the counter. It’s not the lack of speed that could kill the US, it’s the naïveté. It’s not taking care as they should to protect the defensive shape against the counter. We saw it last year in the Confed Cup, and we saw it the other day in the first half against Turkey.

by Steve Davis on Jun 1, 2010 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

In our formation, who slides over to cover?

I always thought, in a 4-4-2 where the right back has the go-ahead to go forward, the wing immediately runs up the wing (tying up the D, the Right back having tied up the opposite winger), and one of the central mid guys slips in to cover (depending on how defined their roles are, it can be a designated role (makalele) or not). In the US system, is that the Center backs role? the Liberos?

by Londonjoe on Jun 1, 2010 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Either the DM or CD

The best example is the first Turkish goal, and as I saw it either the DM on the right (Ricardo Clark) or the CD (DeMerit) needed to slide/drop right once Spector went on his long run to nowhere.

As we saw, neither happened and the only one hustling to get back was Spector himself but of course he was never going to make it. The biggest problem was that DeMerit could not slide right once: a) Goodson committed forward to try and win the ball which left DeMerit alone in the center to mark the Turkish striker, and b) that Clark failed to either mark the ball closely enough to get the Turkish player’s head down or to get back and fill in the marking duties vacated by Spector.

The only way to prevent the goal once Turkey won possession was for DeMerit to immediately drop twenty yards once he read that he was going to be in a 2 v 1 situation. He didn’t. but to be fair, that would have been an amazing read and not something he expect him to see.

For me, Clark’s lack of mobility all night just killed us in the first half. If he plays this way he simply cannot see the field against England or we will get eaten alive.

by brokejumper on Jun 1, 2010 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Demerit

I think that if he had dropped back and closed on Turan more quikly, Turan could have laid it into the two other attackers running up the middle. I thought Demerit did about as well as he could have, giving the circumstances.

Not mediocre. Right about average

by trza on Jun 1, 2010 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Turkey

Clark was really caught out watching the counter on their goal. I have no idea what he was thinking, but he sat there and watched that whole play go by after Turkey won possession. Of course, the entire midfield could be faulted truthfully. In addition to the goal scorer, Turkey had two other players wide open in front of goal. That’s not acceptable.

Not mediocre. Right about average

by trza on Jun 1, 2010 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

The whole situation was bad from the beginning

Because Spector ran into the middle with the ball- An absolute non starter in that particular setup. He should run down the line and allow the overlap down, and then cut to the middle and back or in- giving his team numbers both in the box and in recovery. Somebody needs to slide, but the way Spector set it up was partially to blame for the way the break happened in the first place.

by Londonjoe on Jun 1, 2010 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

ha ha, yeah

I have no idea where Spector thought he was going. I admire his boldness, but the odds of that run working out were pretty low.

Not mediocre. Right about average

by trza on Jun 1, 2010 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

The crazy thing is...

…that that’s been the US personality under Bradley. We give up the lead, then win or tie. What concerns me is that the team (and Bradley) seem to be getting a little too comfortable with that.

It certainly makes it more exciting.

But I’d much prefer holding that 2-0 lead.

by reklemrov on Jun 2, 2010 3:51 PM EDT reply actions  

This is the impression I got during the Confederation Cup

I like international Soccer, but don’t know enough to be that intelligent about the sport. However I still had the feeling that the US had the potential to be a “very good team”, but didn’t seem to be able to put the pieces together enough to really be a “very good team”.

If that makes sense.

Great minds talk about ideas, small minds talk about people" - Eleanor Roosevelt

by ElBacano on Jun 3, 2010 1:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's soccer blog is heavy on the domestic game -- flavored with a dash the global greatness

Recent Posts


Managers

Daily_soccer_fix_crest_small Steve Davis