Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Infuriating Jose Molina

MLS better positioned to reap benefits of Henry et al

Photo

The U.S. soccer scene that Thierry Henry will discover is a substantial notch above the scene that David Beckham came upon just three years ago.

The pace of development in the game here is certainly more plodding than some people would like. But for such a major undertaking, it really does move at a nice pace, all things considered.

The important message here is this: MLS and the domestic soccer establishment in general is far more prepared to reap the publicity benefits of a player like Henry now – in a lot of different ways.

Think for a second about the stadiums Beckham initially encountered as he landed on MLS shores in 2007. Three of the first five MLS stadiums Beckham visited fell squarely into the “less than perfect” category. The Galaxy played on the artificial turf at BMO, then inside the ill fitting NFL stadiums in New York and New England. Both of those also were burdened by the fake grass. Beckham even famously complained about the pox of arty turf, to the high embarrassment of MLS.

Star-divide

 

This stuff matters. The cameras and reporters follow Beckham. What they see screams “temporary.” They tell stories as if MLS was the circus – you know, the circus comes to town, everyone has a good time and then the performers move on.

Dedicated stadiums add a real sense of permanence, a better sense of “place” for professional soccer in theUnited States.

Now look at Henry and the Red Bulls and what they’ll be seeing in the near future:

Henry will play three months of MLS regular season matches and only once go into a stadium that’s not made for soccer. That will be next week down in Houston. And while Robertson Stadium is far from perfect, it does have grass, at least. And the atmosphere is pretty impressive (even if the bathrooms in the old stadium aren’t). And besides, Houston is pretty close to breaking ground on their own ground, a great thing.

Otherwise, the Red Bulls visit Toyota Park in Chicago, BMO Field (now with grass!) in Toronto, Rio Tinto Stadium inSalt Lake CityPizza Hut Park in Dallas and the Home Depot Center in Los Angeles in addition to their home games at beautiful Red Bull Arena.

That’s where Henry and the Red Bulls will be tonight, facing the nouveau riche of Manchester City. (That game is on FSC, by the way, at 6:30 p.m. ET.)

Also consider the footprint of MLS. As Beckham was announced as Major League Soccer’s bell cow in January of 2007, MLS had just completed a season in which just 12 teams competed. Now, Henry is part of a 16-team league. By next year, it will be an 18-team operation.

That’s vital – and it’s critical that MLS keeps expanding its national footprint. Yes, I know the dangers of unchecked expansion, and these things should be carefully governed so that expenses don’t spiral beyond control. (I’m a little concerned about the long-term ramifications of the third DP, for example.) But generally speaking, MLS has no presence in markets where there isn’t an MLS team. So there are wonderful cities in this big ol’ country where MLS remains little more than a rumor. Think about San Diego and Miami, two markets where World Cup ratings were quite strong. There’s no MLS awareness in those markets. (Well, there may be a little in Miami, where MLS failed in nearby Fort Lauderdale. That’s an unfortunate legacy, to be sure.)

Nor is there an MLS presence in AtlantaAustinBaltimoreIndianapolisMemphis, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Phoenix,San Antonio and St. Louis, to name some markets. (Obviously, some of these markets have professional teams, and they all know about soccer generally. But MLS is clearly the country’s most visible professional soccer property.)

So there’s plenty of work to be done.  But the landscape in 2010 looks a lot better than it did just three years ago. Henry is here, and he may soon be joined by a couple of other giants of the global game. MLS is much better positioned today than yesterday to exploit the attached PR blast.

Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I agree that the last thing

that MLS needs is to revert back to the “circus” stage that it has been at in recent years.
It may never take over American sport but it can certainly grow more than it is already.

I’ve just found this site so apologies if you’ve covered this but are you happy with the league structure of MLS?

It strikes me that it’s a format that is trying to copy other American sports rather than what works in soccer.

Anyway MLS arrives in Vancouver next season so plenty to look forward to.

'Does Magna Carta mean nothing to you? Did she die in vain?'

by Arizona via Slough on Jul 25, 2010 1:23 PM EDT reply actions  

The format works

“It strikes me that it’s a format that is trying to copy other American sports rather than what works in soccer.”

MLS is making more money by doing this. Playoffs make more money than single table. Why do you think so many euro leagues always talk about how they could make more money if they copied the NFL and adopted playoffs? That’s what makes the champions league and the world cup so compelling is the knock out stages.

You can change your job, you can change your wife, you can even change your gender, but you can never change your club.
Win or lose, we will always be here for you.
Fear no foe, wherever we go.

by johnjahafanclub on Jul 28, 2010 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

What's the goal for MLS overall?

I know The Don has said he wants to get up to 20 or 22 teams. But once we get to that, do we stop there? I feel like 20 or 22 wouldn’t be enough, given time. Would we stop there and maybe begin to rebuild the USL-MSL link and go to promotion/relegation? Or would we go the NFL/MLB route and expand to 30ish teams, and go with conferences? We’ll be at 19 teams once Montreal gets in there in a couple years. But what about all the potential markets you named above? Will they be forever destined to USL as the highest level?

by chrisperry1983 on Jul 25, 2010 6:13 PM EDT reply actions  

I think it will be a long while before the league can support 30 teams

Even the established “major” sports have teams at the low end of the ladder that only survive because of shared revenue. I’m ca little concerned that the MLS is growing too fast. With the league sending more and more players to Europe successfully it’s only going to get harder to keep young talent around. Adding teams drastically reduces the talent pool available. If the league stretches the available talent too thin that will hurt the league because it will hurt the soccer. A good friend of mind who is not really a soccer fan has commented on how the MLS game “looks” in comparison to the world cup games he saw and a maybe a few champions league/EPL games I made him watch. Sure they could bring in more aging stars, but the novelty will eventually wear off.

I think they probably need to hold steady for a while after adding the teams already on the drawing board. A couple of teams will likely need to relocate at some point too. It probably makes more sense to move a struggling franchise than to to keep it around and add a whole new one.

"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-Bob McNair

by papabear on Jul 27, 2010 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who Would You Relocate

Also, Garber has said he wants a second team in NYC proper to be the 20th team. Who knows if that will happen.

You can change your job, you can change your wife, you can even change your gender, but you can never change your club.
Win or lose, we will always be here for you.
Fear no foe, wherever we go.

by johnjahafanclub on Jul 28, 2010 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I personally would love

to have enough teams that promotion and relegation became factors in the MLS.

'Does Magna Carta mean nothing to you? Did she die in vain?'

by Arizona via Slough on Jul 25, 2010 6:42 PM EDT reply actions  

I would too

My only fear would be the sudden drop in money from lower attendance. I’m past the point of thinking people wouldn’t “get it”…I just don’t know how people would react when their top tier team suddenly dropped to what we percieve as the minors. I’m sure there’s lots of data on this from every other league in the world. We’re just a fickle bunch, I wonder how different it’d be here.

by chrisperry1983 on Jul 25, 2010 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Chattanooga FC!

The Once and Future King

by FlaGators on Jul 25, 2010 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

While I agree with this post

I think that the MLS will always play second fiddle to European leagues, mainly because of the better quality. While it’s great to have local football available, it’s not as great to watch as La Liga, the Premiership, the Champions League

"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"

by firejerrynow on Jul 26, 2010 12:02 PM EDT reply actions  

Wouldn't say always

If we support the domestic league today, the quality of MLS will grow to match and even surpass the other leagues tomorrow. When “tomorrow” comes is in part a function of how much support we provide today. In 1979 the NBA was so lightly regarded in the culture that the finals were shown on tape delay. Things can change.

by Irrlicht on Jul 26, 2010 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

there’s no reason why, in a few years, the MLS can’t be as good as the Bundesliga (for example).

Eventually I suspect it will be the world’s best league.

'Does Magna Carta mean nothing to you? Did she die in vain?'

by Arizona via Slough on Jul 26, 2010 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I doubt it will be the world's best league

Because there will be no Champions League, which has the best football in the world. And because of that, all the best players will want to play in Europe.
Look at what has happened to the Brazilian and Argentinian leagues.

"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"

by firejerrynow on Jul 26, 2010 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Instead of Promotion/Relegation

I see the MLS moving to a farm system similar to MLB. Perhaps the MLS clubs could have a draft for ownership of the USL clubs and then use them to develop talent in a competitive team that spreads the net of the MLS across the country.

There are just too many reasons that promotion/relegation won’t work, namely, that the clubs have invested too much money to have a bad year and push back their break even dates.

I don’t really have a problem with the split table or the playoffs. I would prefer a single table and the top 8 moving on to the playoff, but it doesn’t really matter.

by kopp on Jul 26, 2010 12:06 PM EDT reply actions  

You're right about promotion/relegation

While it would be an exciting structure to watch and keep the upper division more competitive, like you said, owner’s have invested way too much money to ever agree to it.

by the12thman11 on Jul 27, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Promotion/Relegation

One of the major reasons it won’t work is that MLS won’t be able to charge $40 million for expansion franchises to enter the league anymore if they face the threat of being relegated the year after joining. And teams that just joined for 40 million don’t want to see that investment diluted a few years from now by allowing USL clubs to move up into the MLS for free.

You can change your job, you can change your wife, you can even change your gender, but you can never change your club.
Win or lose, we will always be here for you.
Fear no foe, wherever we go.

by johnjahafanclub on Jul 28, 2010 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's soccer blog is heavy on the domestic game -- flavored with a dash the global greatness

Recent Posts


Managers

Daily_soccer_fix_crest_small Steve Davis