Why a WPS - MLS partnership is unlikely to happen
Women’s Professional Soccer held its final Sunday. Now we all sit around and wonder if the league will play another game.
I’m on the record very clearly on WPS: I hope the league makes it … but I’ve said all along that it’s going to be a mighty struggle.
It certainly has been so far, with two clubs folding over the last few months, a dreadfully bad sign.
And it’s hard to find anything positive in the departure of WPS Commissioner Tonya Antonucci, who will not return next year. I don’t follow the league closely enough to assess more precisely what this means, but I know of someone who does. Jenna Pel oversees the exceptional women’s soccer blog All White Kit. (When it comes to women’s soccer, if Jenna or someone else doesn’t post it at All White Kit, then it’s not worth reading about.) Here’s what she says about Antonucci’s departure and a league "in transition:"
The league sits at a crossroad, not at the edge of a cliff. Tonya Antonucci must be recognized for her efforts and her vision. Without her leadership, it’s difficult to imagine any league at all. She helped launch WPS in an unforgiving economy and seems okay with handing over the reins, particularly if it’s for the good of the league.
Pel also pointed out in other posts that regular season attendance declined 31 percent. (She later added some disclaimers and explainers in another post, but at some point you just have to say "this ain’t good" and leave it at that.)
As I said, I’ll leave the analysis of WPS up to people like Pel, and anyone else who can speak with more knowledge and authority on it all. But I will address one thing the outgoing Antonucci mentioned.
She said WPS might need more help from MLS.
While that sounds good and makes perfect sense from an altruistic standpoint, I just don’t see that happening. Not because MLS is run by a bunch of meanies who want to drive women’s professional soccer into a ditch. It’s nothing like that, in fact. Read on for why it makes little sense … and why it probably won’t happen.
MLS is doing fine, but they aren’t exactly printing money at the New York headquarters or at any of the 16 club addresses. There’s still a long slog ahead before teams turn profitable. And I do mean long. If a turn to profit is a drive from New York to L.A., this wagon train is somewhere just east of Pittsburgh. If you’re not sure what that means, Professor Google and his maps will help you understand.
So there’s little motivation for MLS owners to benevolently stoke the fires of WPS and the women’s professional soccer initiative when there’s so much wood to chop for MLS interests.
Major League Soccer has its hands full, still trying to shore up soft spots in the enterprise while bulking up in areas where progress has been gradually gained. TV, for instance, remains a critical work in progress. Some TV deals will soon be up for renewal and it makes no sense for MLS to bundle WPS games, effectively weakening its position.
There continue to be problems in certain markets, like Dallas and Colorado, where there are miles to go to untie the knots created over the last few years. Now there are issues in former strongholds like Toronto. There are stadium issues to sort out, a serious one in the nation’s capital and a looming one in New England.
Neither is there motivation in individual markets to assist WPS. You might not get an MLS official to say so publicly, but there’s little appetite for initiatives that could cannibalize its audiences or undercut efforts to build its MLS crowds.
Face it, there’s only so much soccer dollar to go around – particularly in a soft economy. Let’s say a family goes to five pro soccer games a year in Los Angeles. If the Galaxy benefits by seeing that family in five matches this year, it doesn’t make sense for the club to link arms with a new women’s team there, effectively reducing its take in that family’s annual soccer budget.
Plus, there are dates to consider. Those preferred Saturday night slots are hard enough to secure in some markets given competition with concerts and other stadium commitments. To link up with a WPS side would make it even more difficult to secure those Saturday night dates.
In a perfect world, there probably would be some marriage between the MLS and WPS efforts. But the world is far from perfect, as we all know.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
There will never be a partnership.
What might happen is, a couple of years after WPS fails (if it does. The small absolute dollar amounts in play might help it last for a while), MLS asks its teams in SSS situations to look at their dates (including concerts) and see if it makes sense to add women’s teams. It would then ask its bean counters what budget makes sense. Maybe they buy some of the existing team names/ other IP, but MLS is not going to partner with anything that might be seen as a competitor.
I believe MLS views the popularity of the ‘99 WWC and the women’s game in general to be a double-edged sword, and it won’t mess around with the women’s game without being in complete control.
Thanks for the tip about All White Kit
A month ago I was kvetching to Dave Clark at Sounder at Heart about the lack of a blog covering the women’s game in the expanding list of SBNation soccer sites. Now I have a place to go, just in time for the 2011 Women’s World Cup. USA! USA! USA!
by The King of Norway on Sep 29, 2010 2:15 PM EDT reply actions
Too bad.
She’d be a great addition.
by The King of Norway on Sep 29, 2010 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Sad but I agree.
As a parent whose daughter currently plays high school soccer, I’d love for there to be a women’s team for us to go and support. So I’d like to see MLS step in and help the WPS, but it really does not make sense for them to do so.
Los Angeles is like Manchester. There is a red team that wins championships and a blue team that doesn't.
Dynamics of Women's Market
Okay, let me start with a caveat….it’s tough to dissect a market/demographic for a league in a paragraph. So view what I say next as just an overview/a broad brush.
WPS has trouble with a key demographic—major trouble—and it goes to the viability of their business model. Forget the overall attendance numbers—to support soccer in the USA is to view the long picture, to take the long view. For the longest time, the logic with men’s soccer was…we attract kids to games and families, they eventually become adults who can drive and buy their own tickets and we’ve got fans and then they get families and they raise their kids to play soccer rather than baseball or basketball. And it’s starting to work out. Not quite as easily as everyone thought. But you now see people who say “I went to my first DC United game when I was 7 and now that my wife had our first kid two years ago we just got a family plan and for our son’s second birthday I got him a Jaime Moreno jersey—junior size of course.” Except you could just as easily find someone saying the same for LA Galaxy or Columbus Crew or any of the original teams. It’s not an even line, but many of those youth fans stayed with it and are adult fans and making families who embrace soccer.
So, the logic was….WUSA (and then WPS) was going to draw all those young girls who play youth soccer (and we own the world when it comes to girl’s youth soccer). Look at comments from Mia Hamm, from other stalwarts in the league…about being their for the girls, being their for the young ladies playing soccer. Except….a bizarre thing sees to happen: those 8-9 year old girls who are passionate fans don’t seem to stay with the game as 16 y.o.‘s. Oh yes, some do. But a disproportionate number stop following. The theory seems to be that it’s no longer cool to be a fan. I’m sure it’s more sophisticated than that. And yes, there are plenty of 7-8 y.o. girls who turn in to gifted 16-17 y.o. hard charging, technically gifted, athletically talented soccer players. But not enough to sustain a league. The basic premise of the league: attract young girls (who eventually become teenagers who eventually become adults) doesn’t seem to work out. You can tolerate low numbers if you think the basic business model makes sense and you just need to ride out the recession (at which point advertisers flock to you to capture a market of 15-17 y.o. young women). But if your intended fan-base has to be regrown every couple of years b/c 80-85% suddenly decide they’ve got other priorities, that’s a huge problem.
I know this post will probably be regarded as sexist and I don’t mean it that way. I’m just sharing what the demographic data from a couple of marketing firms has shown. For every fanatic 7 y.o. girl who sticks with soccer into teendom and then adulthood, there are 9 who call it quits around 15-16. If women’s professional soccer is going to make it in the US, there has to be a business model that explains how eventually the fan base will grow and sustain itself. If the next bet is to market to families than unless MLS prices itself out of that market (much like the NBA and NFL have done) than WPS would be seeking to canibailize a big chunk of MLS’ target demographic.
Maybe
they should stop kicking out MLS supporters groups who come out to support their local WPS clubs like they did at the championship game last weekend…
1906 stood and chanted for 90 minutes and then got kicked out for setting off 1 smoke bomb. ridiculous. last time we go to a WPS game.
Win or lose, we will always be here for you.
by johnjahafanclub on Sep 30, 2010 2:01 PM EDT reply actions
we even toned down our language for that game
and didn’t use any swear words
Win or lose, we will always be here for you.
by johnjahafanclub on Sep 30, 2010 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions

by 





