Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Where Do The Lakers Go From Here?

David Beckham loan? Just more bluster to enhance the brand

Beckham, seen here in June with Prince Harry.

David Beckham lives in a place just off the coast of a little place we call planet Earth.

Truly, he’s not one of us. He lives and breathes and plays by rules most of us can’t fathom. That’s not meant to demonize the man – it’s just reality.

So we have to consider all matters David Beckham related in a wholly unique context.  Take the recent swirl of loan reports, rumors and whispers. With someone else, some mere mortal, we might conclude that there are substantive talks between parties who have a real desire to improve their clubs, to form a mutually beneficial partnership.  As Chelsea boss Carlo Ancelotti rightly point out this week, there are clubs for which Beckham would provide handy support at the right-sided positions. Fair enough.

But this is David Beckham, and nothing is quite this clear-cut. There is little clarity in the whirling dervish that is David Beckham’s world.

Here’s what I suspect is going on: Beckham has a vast support network that would humble a few major Hollywood headliners.  After all, his global brand stretches far and wide, and someone must also manage it and, generally speaking, feed the beast. So there’s pressure from points high and low to keep the Beckham buzz alive. Otherwise, the beast dies.

Star-divide

I talked to someone in a position to know out in Los Angeles recently. He theorized the same, that selective leaks have dandy value, regardless of actual chances of fruition.  If they can aggressively float the idea on the front end, it might actually lead to a loan that creates further headlines.  If not, they’ve made headlines in the meantime.

But I have a feeling that Bruce Arena is going to put the kibosh on all of this soon. Perhaps quite soon, like in the next day or so. 

As I wrote yesterday for SI.com, there is absolutely zero benefit for the Galaxy here. I won’t repeat all the reasons; there  are 1,600 words on the topic if you care to go read about it, if you aren’t already tired of the latest round of self-important branding concerns from Camp Beckham. I’m not the only one who places this high on the totem pole of terrible ideas. Soccer America’s Paul Gardner agrees, as does vet soccer writer Ives Galarcep.

Arena has no problem being the bad guy in these situations. I don’t mean that is a disparaging way. His job is to look out for the Galaxy’s interest, and I think he’s well within his rights – check that, it’s his duty – to stand up against Brand Beckham handlers and yes men and say, “No, we’re not loaning Beckham, it doesn’t do a thing for us.”

Beckham could indeed prove be wrong. He could validate the bluster and actually be training with a team in England by this time next week.

But I doubt it. Even a man who lives just off the coast of the planet Earth has to put his feet on the ground with the rest of us at some point.

Comment 5 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I hope you are right.

As you said in the SI piece Beckham has form for changing his mind once he is out on loan.

He really does owe LA a full season (or at least serious preperation for a full season).

"Serious sport has nothing to do with fair play. It is bound up with hatred, jealousy, boastfulness, and disregard of all the rules."- George Orwell

by Arizona via Slough on Jan 4, 2011 12:35 PM EST reply actions  

As a Quakes fan

I hope they loan him out again! Especially to the hard-tackling EPL! Crunch!

Seriously though I can’t imagine another loan for him. The English tabloids are being insanely stupid as usual with their Beckham loan “rumors.”

Win or lose, we will always be here for you.

by johnjahafanclub on Jan 4, 2011 4:29 PM EST reply actions  

Does Arena have a choice?

Maybe, Beckham signed the original contract with loans in mind. His contract may state that the Galaxy cannot block a loan deal. Think about it. Last year. Why would the Galaxy let him go on loan for six months and not three, like Donovan? Again. What did the Galaxy have to gain?

by Camnehem on Jan 4, 2011 10:05 PM EST reply actions  

Last year...

The point of the extended loan was to put Beckham in a position to play in another World Cup. One could argue that having another player, especially one with the profile of Beckham, in the World Cup would benefit the Galaxy. Obviously it didn’t work out that way though.

Los Angeles is like Manchester. There is a red team that wins championships and a blue team that doesn't.

by oc phil on Jan 5, 2011 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

That's a fair point

It made a little bit of sense, at least, for LA last year

by Steve Davis on Jan 5, 2011 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's soccer blog is heavy on the domestic game -- flavored with a dash the global greatness

Recent Posts


Managers

Daily_soccer_fix_crest_small Steve Davis