Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Yu Darvish Diagnosed With Mariners Fever

Spanish hangover: Was U.S. Soccer a little naïve here?

We all love seeing a team like Spain play the beautiful game the right way. But the timing of Saturday's match was off; U.S. Soccer may have learned a lesson on this one.

Generally speaking, I’m not a big fan of the "British condition" when it comes to soccer. There is frequent presumption of superiority and self-importance about the game. They invented it. They know it better than anyone else. And they’ll tell you so, if only in their quintessentially understated British way.

That said, their historical stacks of knowledge do rise much higher than the Americans’ historical base. They do know plenty about the game’s ins and outs. And every now and then something happens that reminds us of it.

About this U.S. Soccer decision to battle Spain on the eve of a tournament they had stamped "High Priority," I’m picturing a scene like this:

A few UK soccer execs, a mix of managers and officials, are standing around after a practice, chit-chatting about the just-completed weekend of international matches. Someone mentions with an uppity chuckle about the United States getting its pants pulled down by Spain.

Chap A: "Aren’t they about to play in the Gold Cup, or something? Isn’t that their big regional tournament."

Chap B: "Yeah. There’s a place in the Confederations Cup at stake. Who wouldn’t want that?"

Chap A: "So why in the bloody hell would they take on the best team in the world? And just three days before a tournament opener? Don’t the Yanks know anything?"

Chap C: "Well, they do have In-N-Out Burger. So there’s that."

Then they all have a little laugh and move on to lunch plans, confident that the English FA or any other more worldly association would never make such a mistake.

And you know, in this case, they might be right – as much as I hate to admit it.

In my mind, U.S. Soccer was a little naïve here.

Read on for more on U.S. Soccer’s schedule management. Click here for my U.S.-Spain game report and player ratings at SI.com. Or click here for the overall Gold Cup preview, including thumbnail sketches on all 12 teams.

Star-divide

 

I don’t think Sunil Gulati and Co. thought this one all the way through. Gulati is an economics instructor by trade, and a sharp cookie, in my opinion. Along with U.S. Soccer CEO Dan Flynn, they brought some fiscal sanity to soccer’s governing body; the federation’s accounting and balance sheets were badly mangled back in the late 1990s and into the new decade.

So, from that perspective, the decision to play Spain looks brilliant. Obviously, it was always going to be a nice payday. But from a competitive standpoint, they might have missed the boat on this one. If they needed a match to ramp up for Gold Cup, there was an entire menu of mid-level opponents available.

U.S. Soccer will say, and has said, that opportunities like this don’t come along often. But is that really the case? The United States has hosted Brazil, Argentina and now Spain all in the last eight months. So, it looks to me like these juicy opportunities are falling at a pretty nice clip.

If the United States beats Canada on Tuesday and gets the Gold Cup effort heading in the right direction, all can be forgiven. Hopefully, however, an important lesson has been learned here.

Comment 16 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I don’t see how anyone can argue with Chap C. Sure, a 4-0 loss on home soil doesn’t look very good, but do we really think it makes them any less likely to succeed in the Gold Cup? Maybe a slice of humble pie (animal style) is exactly what they needed to get them focused.

by Frank Reich Revolution on Jun 6, 2011 12:01 PM EDT reply actions  

not to mention

you dont develop as a player, playing mid tier competition. you have to keep playing the top teams in the world. this is the only way us soccer will continue to progress. i for one would always want to take on the best.

by chrisltr22c on Jun 6, 2011 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I Am Right There With You

In that we will not get better as a soccer nation unless we continually play against top-level competition. the USSF (and CONCACAF) needs to take that line of thinking by accepting tournament bids to the Copa America – why the HELL is a team like Japan going (or was going…does anyone know for certain?) when we could go and improve our players?

CONCACAF and CONMEBOL need to hook up a 16 team tournament, so our region stops getting outplayed in crunch time at World Cup tournaments. USA and Mexico can hold their own for the most part, but our third and sometimes fourth teams get waxed…

It is my hope that before i die i witness these two things at least once - The Titans winning a Super Bowl and Team USA winning the World Cup.

by Pulp Fiction on Jun 7, 2011 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Forgetting the Maine

I was at that game, and – speaking personally – I don’t even think a run-of-the-mill win against Canada is going to make up for that embarrassment. USMNT needs to win the Cup, or at least put in some of the world-class performances once expected of them.

by Jack McNamara on Jun 6, 2011 12:04 PM EDT reply actions  

It will be forgotten

when we beat Mexico in the final. That will erase all memory of this loss. It was bad for sure, but a good test for young players who need to fail to the best to see where they need to be.

Chad the Ref

by Chad the Ref on Jun 6, 2011 12:59 PM EDT reply actions  

This is true...

But the way that Mexico has been playing, it is not a forgone conclusion that we will beat them in the final of the tournament, if everything shakes out just right.

It is my hope that before i die i witness these two things at least once - The Titans winning a Super Bowl and Team USA winning the World Cup.

by Pulp Fiction on Jun 7, 2011 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Spain...and Gold Cup

This USMNT is difficult to read. Not a real impressive past 12 months. Now…some games have been against true powers. But how much of that is a factor of us upgrading our competition and how much of it is our side perhaps dropping down a bit. B/c it’s quite possible that we peaked in 2009-2010. We’ve got a lot of older players (Bocanegra for instance) that play important roles on this side, we need to transition in youth and we’re even more dependent on Donovan than we previously were. And then you add in some youth (Altidore and Adu) that haven’t taken the next step or two up that we all hoped for after their U20 performances.

What that means is….the US could just cruise through the GC and beat Mexico 2-0. Or maybe we’ll see that the past year is indeed a sign that like the 1994 WC team that shined in the Copa but was too old in 1998, maybe our current bunch of “lads” is just a little bit past their “sell date”. Maybe this is a USMNT that drops out in the semis—or gets spanked by Mexico. It’s very difficult for me to tell at this point.

by JoeWillmore on Jun 6, 2011 1:38 PM EDT reply actions  

well said

Yup, this side could possibly hold their own offensively against Mexico, but the defense may well be a liability. sadly, i think that getting exposed by a CONCACAF team may be the only thing to open Bradley’s eyes to our current crop of aging defensive players not cutting it anymore…and our inconsistent young strikers as well.

It is my hope that before i die i witness these two things at least once - The Titans winning a Super Bowl and Team USA winning the World Cup.

by Pulp Fiction on Jun 7, 2011 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

“They know it better than anyone else. And they’ll tell you so, if only in their quintessentially understated British way.”

Odd, last year at the bar during US-England they were pretty blatant screaming “LEARN THE (freaking) RULES!”

by Patrick MacDonald on Jun 6, 2011 3:52 PM EDT reply actions  

A game against Spain should come when the team needs to test themselves and find where they are lacking. Playing them when they did only taught us that the U.S. can’t compete on their level when the game is just a side thought.

by Derek R on Jun 6, 2011 5:10 PM EDT reply actions  

That wasn't the USMNT

It was a mix of second and third string. And it was a friendly. Meaning of the game = zero. More like a training session than anything.

by Fnarf on Jun 6, 2011 6:54 PM EDT reply actions  

C'mon, it's Spain! Don't make too much of this!

This was a friendly, against the best team in the world. There are no down-sides to this from my perspective. Sure we didn’t start with our A team. Neither did Spain. So what? Did anyone really expect that the USMNT would hold up against Spain in any configuration?

My experience as a coach is that when you get your pants beaten off by a good team you get better. After this, Gold Cup games should feel like we’ve got 12 men on the field.

BTW, Michael Bradley is good. That’s one thing I took away from this.

by DrWeevil on Jun 6, 2011 9:34 PM EDT reply actions  

it was a friendly

Why not see what certain players can or can’t do? I wouldn’t make too much of this.

by PeterJH on Jun 7, 2011 10:59 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm Pretty Sure the US Plays Spain

when Spain says it has an opening and the US jumps on it. Maybe it wasn’t great timing but playing Spain with the B team is still a great development opportunity.

The problem isn’t playing Spain, its playing teams like Guadeloupe and Grenada way too often and wasting valuable development time playing the D teams of the CONCACAF that is the problem.

by Cool Dudes on Jun 8, 2011 12:22 AM EDT reply actions  

To Be Clear Hear

It would be more valuable to the US if they just made the Gold Cup a Best of 7 series of the US and Mexico.

The rest of CONCACAF might have a problem with that though.

by Cool Dudes on Jun 8, 2011 12:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's soccer blog is heavy on the domestic game -- flavored with a dash the global greatness

Recent Posts


Managers

Daily_soccer_fix_crest_small Steve Davis