Tweaking the MLS All-Star game
I love the MLS All-Star format and don’t think they should change – and definitely don’t believe the league should acquiesce to a fresh round of reactionary East v. West sentiment.
But I certainly think some tweaking of the event is in order. Nothing says, “Tweak away!” like a 4-0 ass-whuppin, especially it comes one year after a 5-2 ass-whuppin.
Specifically, I believe the competitive balance needs reconsideration – lest this thing quickly becomes counterproductive. Long story short, I think MLS has bitten off more than it could chew, opposition-wise.
Another match against mighty and majestic Manchester United on Wednesday turned into the next chance for MLS to walk slink away humbly, murmuring excuses.
I’ve heard some of the comments, including one from Alex Ferguson himself, suggesting the 4-0 score flattered United. To which I say: nonsense. The visitors were always in control (after about 20 minutes, at any rate) and never really needed to shift into high gear to remain so.
I’m also hearing that Hans Backe got the MLS tactics all wrong. I agree to a point, but with this caveat: I don’t think it mattered. Backe could have arranged the group into something slight more orthodox and I’m sure the result would have been about the same. (I predicted 2-1 or 3-1 for Man U on SI.com’s podcast.) You may say that a conventional 4-4-2 would have given MLS a fighting chance, at least. But I would counter with this: last year’s 4-4-2 didn’t work out so swimmingly either. (Funny thing, I don’t remember anyone kicking the crap out of Bruce Arena’s tactics in that one, nor should they.)
Essentially, Manchester United’s personnel is superior even to Major League Soccer’s elite. That’s the bottom line. Consider the starting lineups: (Click forward ...)
Player ratings for the Major League Soccer selections at SI.com are here.
Manchester United’s first XI on Wednesday brimmed with internationals, men at the tip-top of their profession. Major League Soccer’s starting XI included three current internationals – and that’s stretching it just a little by counting Shalrie Joseph (for tiny Grenada), Tim Ream (a U.S. part-time starter) and Omar Cummings (Jamaica). There are four (mostly) famous names and former internationals in Thierry Henry, David Beckham, Faryd Mondragon and Omar Bravo. They remain good and talented players, but there’s a reason they aren’t full internationals for their countries anymore. Heck, I count three players who aren’t anywhere near the top of the pool for the United States, a mid-level national team (Brad Davis, Bobby Convey and Sean Franklin – and please save the “Davis and Convey should get call-ups” arguments for another conversation.)
So, nobody could look at Wednesday’s matchups and truly expect a different result. Even if you allow the “preseason” factor (that Manchester United is neither fully sharp nor fit) to mitigate the “real team” factor (that MLS is a collection of talent but not a cohesive unit that practices together, etc.), then you’re left with a huge personnel imbalance that will almost always tip the competitive balance.
That’s no shame in it. Manchester United resides in the toniest of neighborhoods in global soccer, expecting to compete for EPL and European trophies every year.
So what’s the answer? Simple: don’t play them in the All-Star game.
As I said, I like the format. I’ve seen complaints about the quality of certain MLS All-Stars (“Some of those guys aren’t truly All-Stars!”) by the very same people advocating a return to the old East-West format. Well, which one do you want? Because some of those fellows who might have caused you to grimace when they trotted on in the second half Wednesday would be starters in a (more diluted) East-West format.
I’ve said before, arguments that favor an East-West format usually identify “tradition” as one of the reasons to favor it. But they fail to acknowledge that the East-West format is pitifully tired, and that the sister events in professional baseball, basketball and football are limping along like old three-legged dogs, with interest long on the wane.
THAT is what you want for MLS?
So I say, keep the format – but identify a more fitting level of competition. There was nothing wrong when Celtic, Fulham, Everton or West Ham represented the opposition. Or, if fans and league officials aren’t so smitten with mid-level sides from the EPL, La Liga, Serie A, etc., then go lure Ajax, Bayern Munich, Juventus or similarly high-profile European (or Mexican) clubs. No, they won’t come with the same “Wow Factor” as Manchester United – but the end result will probably be more valuable.
12 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thank you
for perfectly summing up my feelings on this.
I’m not convinced that the MLS All-Stars need to beat the side they are playing. It’s an exhibition and should focus more on promoting the stars of the MLS and a top international club team.
These All-star games don’t need to prove anything. Make it a day for the players and the fans, get a top team to come in and tell everyone to have a fun time.
As much as I like to ignore the Jim Romes and Norman Chads of the world, why give them extra ammo for their MLS-is-a-joke rants? I agree with Steve that a slightly lower level of competition would be appropriate.
by fennsk1 on Jul 28, 2011 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Best summation of the MLS All Star Game I've read online
Kudos, Steve. Great idea for a format, horrible selection of opponent.
You’d think US Soccer/MLS would have learned their lesson last year. After two years of shredding the MLS All Star team (and Seattle’s 7-0 drubbing), I’m betting Man U won’t get as many invitations to play over here next year.
Oh wait – it’s about money, that’s right. Next year Man U will probably not only return, but play in more matches…
SSFC | What I do for fun: Sometimes-Interesting
more laid back game
I am not sure how to accomplish this, but this game needs to be approached as even less than a friendly. It is not a match, it is an exhibition. The game is about seeing all stars. So it should be approached with fun and creatively in mind. This should be a time for players to be ball hogs…a time for defenders to push forward (as Cameron attempted a few times).
Lack of organization and lack of familiarity of teammates on both sides is one thing that makes other sports all star games fun. This opens up play, leaves teams open to the counter and more fun in general.
I believe that has been brought up elsewhere...
From what has been said, which I agree with. If ManU is here for their pre-season it’s going to be hard to convience them to take it easy for the fan’s sake.
I feel like there is a large rift between fans that are on SB Nation and other blogs and the everyday local paper folk. One thing that could help is if the league did take some sort of “break” to celebrate the league like the MLB break. Surely it’d be hard to do but might help with the pressure.
Sports. Right?
Well put
But playing Man U does represent a sort of “measuring stick” that few teams are consistently good enough to give the MLS. I’m not saying we need to play Man U every year, but if we play them in 3-5 years and it’s a closer match, it will probably be a tangible sign of the overall improvement to the league.
I agree that we shouldn’t play them every year, and it would be good for the fans to see other great sides from around Europe as well. However, we should keep the Man U option on the table every few years.
Dooley-isms Archiving the Genius.
Honestly, I'd just do away with the All-Star game.
The American fascination with All-Star games strikes me as pretty outdated. There was a time before 24/7 cable coverage when it was appealing to see a sport’s stars aligned in one place. But now I can watch the talents of Superstar Player X on my mobile phone, anytime. There’s just no need for a meaningless exhibition any more.
For soccer and MLS in particular, it’s a particularly annoying distraction in addition to the other friendlies and fixture congestion all the teams face. This year’s game saw several All-Star calibre players not able to attend because of CCL matches. If there’s anything that could be punted to relieve schedule pressures, this game is it.
by The King of Norway on Jul 29, 2011 11:46 AM EDT reply actions
I think its key to note...
…that despite the obvious differences in talent, we’re talking about an MLS All-Star team that only had something like two days of practice together. Not that we should make any excuses, but I do think it’s the difference between a 4-0 match and maybe a 2-0 or 3-1 match.
It should be said that ...
…one of the biggest aspects of the MLS game is its physicality and that is completely taken out in these friendlies. As a fan, it is great to see these world class clubs come over and get in shape by beating up on the Americans. You just have to hope that these clubs and their international fans don’t accept what they see on the surface, that we are just patsies or fodder that can’t match up …
I have a blog too! www.scottyhockey.com
Let's Go Rangers!

by 






