Soccer on TV, Arlo White, and the splendid one-man broadcast booth
Arlo White now has his boots in the booth for NBC Sports Networks, and his successor behind the microphone for Seattle Sounders FC has been revealed.
I’m sure Ross Fletcher will do a bang-up job, and I’m truly intrigued to observe how Kasey Keller makes the transition from player to TV analyst, especially considering he’s in the starting blocks at one of Major League Soccer’s more important and higher profile regional broadcast positions.
But I can’t help thinking the larger soccer broadcasting scene just went the wrong way. Not because Seattle hired the wrong personnel to replace (the somewhat irreplaceable) Arlo White. Rather, because they hired two men to replace one.
I’m not just blowing wind up White’s trousers here, although I do believe he does a wonderful job. And I'm sure he'll crush it at NBC. Rather, I’m talking about how much I loved White as a solo act in the booth.
Finding the right chemistry between a play-by-play voice and an analyst is such tricky math in soccer – and almost nobody in our country gets it right.
It’s really about the history of traditional American sports, in my opinion, and the wildly different pace compared to soccer. The two-man booth in other American sports made perfect sense because its history was rooted in football and baseball. What do you have in those sports? Down time. Lots and lots of down time.
So the play-by-play voice absolutely did need a helping hand, a complement for better booth balance. And the back-and-fourth could be conducted at a relatively smooth, conversational pace.
But soccer’s pace is so very different, with constant action that really doesn’t jibe with the two-man system, not the way it’s built in the United States, at any rate. So we get this rattle-prattle effect, with two men in the booth scatter shooting in a conversation that too frequently takes the focus away from the on-field action. I’ve written about this before, so I won’t go on about it.
Yes, it can has been done correctly. Mostly, however, the two-man booth becomes a distracting rattle-trap.
So the original (and bold) broadcast choices in the Sound were important, I thought. White was a one-man band who almost always nailed the right notes. Through efficiency of words and smart descriptive outlay, he provided the perfect blend of self-contained action-reaction. He showed that one man, well-prepped and well-chosen, could handle the job with a smart aplomb.
So I had this hope that more MLS clubs might follow. Alas, maybe we’re just not there yet.
Marc Stein and I had White on Soccer Today our weekly radio show/podcast last week. Click forward to hear what the former Sounders broadcaster had to say when I asked him about this matter. Not surprisingly, his answer was thoughtful and insightful.
First, we reached White in England, where he was part of the "Blue Army," en route to see his beloved Leicester City. The day was blustery, wet and generally miserable, and yet White couldn’t have been more excited about it, talking up the rare chance to buy his own ticket, to occupy the stands with his fellow Leicester fans and maybe even "shout at the referee every now and again," something he certainly avoids on the job. It was a pleasure (And a real hoot!) speaking to White. Only regret: that we didn’t roll tape on our 10 minutes of the off-air chit-chat and let everyone hear that, too.
You really should check out the entire interview from Soccer Today. (By the way, we’ve got U.S. international and Sporting Kansas City striker Teal Bunbury lined up for tomorrow, along with FC Dallas coach Schellas Hyndman. Getting top guests is our calling card on the show, so check it out. Here’s the link.)
As for White, here was his terrific answer about working a one-man booth for the Sounders:
"It’s Interesting because I have the experience of both, I suppose, at the BBC before I joined Seattle. When they told me that’s the route they wanted to go down, I was frankly a little concerned, and they had to persuade me a one-man both was away to go. Once the decision was made, I was happy to go along with it and I had confidence in myself that I would be able to pull it off. So it worked. Now, whether that’s the model for everybody I’m not entirely sure.
"The times in my career in Seattle when I found that having someone to bounce off would have nice, it was the big decisions, the big, controversial moments. Was that a hand ball? Was it not a hand ball? Was that a foul? Was it not a foul? Ninety-five person of the time I was loving every second of it. But just every now and then, it would have been nice to look over at somebody and say, "What did you think?"
"Because it’s not necessarily the play-by-play man’s job to come down on one side or the other. So you find yourself coming out with sentences like, "Well, I’ve seen it given," when it comes to hand balls, whether it was deliberate or not? Then you kind of lurch into clichés sometimes, which is something I don’t like to do.
"So, 95 percent of the time, absolutely fine. I loved it. Every now and then, would been nice to talk to someone.
"Now, whether that person is next to you all the time, chirping in all the time, I’m not entirely sure I would have liked that either. So there is a happy medium to be struck here. … There is medium in between letting the play-by-play man describe the action and the color man come in at pertinent moments and not just talking all the time. And I think that’s a situation I think we will achieve this year on NBC."
So there you have it from the man himself.
I’d still like for more clubs to try a one-man booth – but I suppose we’re just not quite there yet.
7 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I was ready to post...
that NBC unfortunately wants to hire a color man to partner White (hmm, that doesn’t sound right does it?), but then I got to the last quote and he mentioned it himself.
Anyway, I think John Strong and Robbie Earle are on the right track in Portland. Strong does the heavy lifting and only brings Earle in for commentary after a big moment. Sometimes it seems a bit forced, but hopefully they’ll find that rhythm or happy medium Arlo mentions.
You note in the article that it can and has been done correctly
I’d be interested in hearing who you thought got it right and why it worked for those broadcasters.
by Nevtelen on Jan 13, 2012 12:16 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I'd also like to hear Steve's opinion on this
But I don’t think there is much doubt that ESPN’s Ian Darke and Steve McManaman do a good job and I’d pretty much give at least a passing grade to all the EPL teams on FSC. A few, like Trevor Francis, have their quirks, but are still way ahead of the national MLS broadcasters in my opinion.
I like the "less is more" approach, but in the end I think it's all about finding the right people for the job.
Even in baseball a one man booth can work when you have a guy who can carry it, like Vin Scully. With Arlo White, the Sounders found a guy who can make a single man booth work, and I hope that NBC finds a great commentator to pair with him.
There are many examples in all sports of booth partnerships that work, too, and many that don’t (there’s whole blogs dedicated to terrible sports announcing). In the Sounders case, I can see why they went with a pair in Fletcher in Keller. I think putting someone in the booth who is so beloved in Kasey Keller is a no-brainer for the Sounders, and they simply had to find a professional play-by-play guy to go along with him.
Also, right or wrong, the Sounders simulcast on TV and radio, and the radio coverage is one area where White’s broadcasting was lacking. What we like about TV coverage – letting the images explain themselves without constant chatter – can get lost on radio. Often, one could struggle to figure out what was going on during the game while listening on the radio. Having a two man booth hopefully will enable Fletcher to describe more of the action on the field, leaving Keller to give analysis. Here’s hoping that it works.
Great Topic
This is a big issue that deserves some serious attention. I think the mouth running color analysts who spin their 5 minute yarns and take all the attention away from the tension and flow of a game are really hurting MLS and U.S. Soccer. (See Christopher Sullivan and John Harkes. These guys generally have a lot of good things to say, but its much better in the form or a pre-game or half time show than in-game commentary.)
One of soccer’s selling points to the American audience – something that makes it different than all the other sports and a good fit for the younger generations who no longer sit through commercials – is the constant flow and building tension of the game. A color commentator who cannot keep his commentary short and punchy so as not to interfere with the flow of the match is necessary. (Most of the English two man announcing teams have this right.)
My pick for the American with great potential as a color analyst- Jimmy Conrad. Very sharp dry wit – quick to the joke, plus he gives good short., direct, meat and potatoes tactical comments that do help people better understand the game. I hope NBC puts him with Arlo.
I have heard Keller in the booth a few times and he is certainly a good speaker with good insight on the game. Not much of a sense of humor though.
Lots of great thoughts there ...
On the last one, perhaps Keller will grow into the job a little, and maybe loosen up a bit as he gets more comfortable with the new gig.
That said. . .
I think your comments are right, but in the US culture where we’re used to (at least) two guys in the booth, a solo flight can come off as the by-product of a shoestring budget. I just don’t think a broadcast network or major cable can pull it off these days. Color guys definitely need to dial it back, but these broadcasters are looking to make it feel like they’ve put money into their soccer show and I feel like a single caller often mixes that message.
'Gentlemen' he said,
'I don't need your organization,
I've shined your shoes,
moved your mountains and marked your cards,
but Eden is burning.
Either get ready for elimination,
or else your heart must have the courage,
for the changing of the guards.'

by 






