Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Yu Darvish Diagnosed With Mariners Fever

Pondering Omar Gonzalez and the value of MLS loan deals ...

Omar Gonzalez ... in happier times.

I caught up with a buddy yesterday. Good dude. Hadn’t seen him in a while. So we hit a local pub and swapped talk over a couple of pints, abetted by "Jules," a wickedly effective siren at the art of suggestive selling.

We started a little early. And when you do that, there might just be trouble ahead.

So today I’m leaning to the sluggish side. You know how that goes.

The point here is this: Almost everything worthwhile in life comes at some price. Would I rather be steaming ahead at 100 percent capacity today? Sure. But do I regret getting out last night, squeezing a little more life juice out of this thing, a little better for passing the night with a drink and a friend?

Hell no.

In front of that background, let’s talk about Omar Gonzalez. And let’s broaden the conversation to MLS loan deals, which are suddenly hotter than Rooney Mara’s Dragon Tatooed-resume.

I’ve known Omar since before he left for Maryland. Just a few weeks ago, we were chatting about a nearby neighborhood where he grew up, and he let me in on the secret of where to get the best snow cones in the world. (But only in the summer, of course.)

I absolutely hate that he got hurt. Just when things were going so well for the young man, this terrible thing happened at FC Nürnberg. I mean, he finally gets into Jurgen Klinsmann’s national team camp, and he finally gets a shot at bigger and better exposure overseas … and now he’s out for about six months.

And cue the roar and rumble over the scourge of loan deals in 3, 2, 1 …

Star-divide

Yes, now comes the 20-20 hindsight, I suppose. Should MLS teams reconsider the value of pimping out their valuable talent to overseas sides that, in some cases, probably couldn’t spell MLS if you spotted them the "M" and the "L." In other words, they don’t necessarily hold MLS in high regard and could presumably make choices that aren’t in the best interests of the stateside clubs.

I say, "poppycock."

These loan arrangements do have value, especially for younger talent. We can debate the value of Thierry Henry’s coming spell at Arsenal, but even that has residual value in global exposure for a league that could still use some. (Not nearly as much as 10 or even 5 years ago, for sure, but spreading the word of MLS quality remains a work in progress.)

Could a player such as Tim Ream, for example, use a couple of months of seasoning, getting real tests in actual matches (as opposed to just training spells)? You bet.

Did Landon Donovan’s time previously at Goodison Park help cement his place in U.S. Soccer lore, and help him gain leadership chops that could still reap benefits for the Galaxy and for the United States national team? Absolutely.

Are there risks? Of course. See "Gonzalez."

Then again, the Galaxy center back and 2011 MLS Defender of the Year could have just as easily been injured training in Phoenix, where the national team is currently working out. He did, after all, injure the knee in a collision with a fellow U.S. international, Tim Chandler.

There’s a risk-reward calculation to everything. It’s just life.

If you want to cover your body in bubble wrap and sequester yourself in a central area of your home, away from windows to avoid any stray shards of glass, you’d probably increase your (already strong) odds of surviving the day. But it’s gonna be a pretty lousy day. It’s a tradeoff, you see? It’s always a tradeoff.

Comment 7 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I disagree partially

mostly agree… these loans make a lot of sense for young guys or even guys in their prime like Donovan.

However, for aged veterans like Henry, Keane, and Beckham… no thank you! Way too much of an injury risk for old guys. See all the work of the AC Milan lab in terms of the statistical probability of injuries for players. They are very rigid about keeping their older players on a rotation and limiting their starts/minutes so that they don’t get injured or broken down… it’s part of how they squeezed so much extra mileage out of Inzaghi, Maldini, Seedorf, Pirlo etc etc.

Win or lose, we'll always be there for you.

by johnjahafanclub on Jan 6, 2012 7:17 PM EST reply actions  

definitely agree

I think these loans have tremendous value for young guys especially from the national team perspective. Even the older players I think at worst is a wash.

by spfldillinois on Jan 8, 2012 1:44 AM EST via iPhone app reply actions  

Loans Gone Bad

Ben Olsen is the poster child for what can go wrong with a “rent-to-own” deal. He was on loan in England, impressing tremendous, the club involved (Nottingham Forrest) was talking about purchasing him outright. And he suffered two serious (nearly career-ending) injuries to his ankles (that were never right after that). He stopped being a quick-silver attacking player and ended up transitioning to holding midfield.

Doesn’t mean loan deals are a bad thing. Only that in the field of professional sports, there is always a big risk.

by JoeWillmore on Jan 8, 2012 12:25 PM EST reply actions  

agree there's a risk

Scared money don’t make no money though.

by spfldillinois on Jan 8, 2012 4:03 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Disagree in this case

The problem with this deal – from the Galaxy/MLS perspective is that, as I understand, Gonzo’s MLS contract has just one more year on it. So he gets injured, is worthless to the entire soccer world until the day he finishes his MLS deal, then gets to walk off on a free transfer.

MLS teams should bear the injury risk of a loan if they are going to get something out of it: More experience for a young player is only good if the MLS team is going to use that better more experienced player on the pitch or to get a transfer fee. If the guy is about to be out of contract, then they don’t really stand to benefit.

If I was an MLS boss, my default rule would be no loans unless you have at least 2 seasons to go on your MLS deal. That way, if you have an injury, I still have your rights for at least one healthy season, so use on the pitch or selling you is still an option after you get back from injury.

Its a matter of balancing risk and reward. What exactly the Galaxy were going to get out of this loan? Was Gonzo going to be THAT much better in MLS 2012 because he spent 2 months in Germany?

Of course, I am probably uninformed about some mechanism of international soccer transfers that undermines the premise of my position. So feel free to educate me on this one.

by LateNite504FC on Jan 9, 2012 11:16 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's soccer blog is heavy on the domestic game -- flavored with a dash the global greatness

Recent Posts


Managers

Daily_soccer_fix_crest_small Steve Davis